Analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the Northern Vosges, France

Summary Key to bridging knowing–doing gaps is analysis of the constraints binding interactions between decision-makers and conservation biologists to clarify the problems they address. We apply this analysis to decision situations in the Northern Vosges (France), which illustrate three kinds of cons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Conservation
Main Authors: Mangos, Anaï, Rouchier, Juliette, Meinard, Yves
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0376892921000175
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0376892921000175
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0376892921000175
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0376892921000175 2024-09-15T18:41:47+00:00 Analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the Northern Vosges, France Mangos, Anaï Rouchier, Juliette Meinard, Yves 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0376892921000175 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0376892921000175 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Environmental Conservation volume 48, issue 3, page 174-181 ISSN 0376-8929 1469-4387 journal-article 2021 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892921000175 2024-08-14T04:03:57Z Summary Key to bridging knowing–doing gaps is analysis of the constraints binding interactions between decision-makers and conservation biologists to clarify the problems they address. We apply this analysis to decision situations in the Northern Vosges (France), which illustrate three kinds of constraints: governance, framework and initiative. We explore how conservation biologists can mitigate constraints so as to foster more ambitious conservation actions in each case. The first case explores attempts at reintroducing the lynx ( Lynx lynx ). In this case, we show that governance plays a key role, in the sense that conservation actions should focus on improving the acceptability of reintroductions to key stakeholders. The second case refers to water monitoring schemes. Here we show that framing is the dominant constraint. This means that conservation actions are tightly limited by the use of a restrictive scientific apparatus. The last case study, fish stock protection, is constrained by initiative. Here, decision-makers have too much leverage to implement solutions they favour, even if they are not the best options in conservation terms. Exploring how our framework relates to the existing literature allows us to highlight its usefulness for rationalizing conservation problem framing and for strengthening the ambitions of conservation actions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Lynx Lynx lynx lynx Cambridge University Press Environmental Conservation 1 8
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Summary Key to bridging knowing–doing gaps is analysis of the constraints binding interactions between decision-makers and conservation biologists to clarify the problems they address. We apply this analysis to decision situations in the Northern Vosges (France), which illustrate three kinds of constraints: governance, framework and initiative. We explore how conservation biologists can mitigate constraints so as to foster more ambitious conservation actions in each case. The first case explores attempts at reintroducing the lynx ( Lynx lynx ). In this case, we show that governance plays a key role, in the sense that conservation actions should focus on improving the acceptability of reintroductions to key stakeholders. The second case refers to water monitoring schemes. Here we show that framing is the dominant constraint. This means that conservation actions are tightly limited by the use of a restrictive scientific apparatus. The last case study, fish stock protection, is constrained by initiative. Here, decision-makers have too much leverage to implement solutions they favour, even if they are not the best options in conservation terms. Exploring how our framework relates to the existing literature allows us to highlight its usefulness for rationalizing conservation problem framing and for strengthening the ambitions of conservation actions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mangos, Anaï
Rouchier, Juliette
Meinard, Yves
spellingShingle Mangos, Anaï
Rouchier, Juliette
Meinard, Yves
Analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the Northern Vosges, France
author_facet Mangos, Anaï
Rouchier, Juliette
Meinard, Yves
author_sort Mangos, Anaï
title Analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the Northern Vosges, France
title_short Analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the Northern Vosges, France
title_full Analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the Northern Vosges, France
title_fullStr Analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the Northern Vosges, France
title_full_unstemmed Analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the Northern Vosges, France
title_sort analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the northern vosges, france
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0376892921000175
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0376892921000175
genre Lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
genre_facet Lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
op_source Environmental Conservation
volume 48, issue 3, page 174-181
ISSN 0376-8929 1469-4387
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892921000175
container_title Environmental Conservation
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 8
_version_ 1810486160522215424