Wildlife habitat selection on landscapes with industrial disturbance

SUMMARY Technological advancements in remote sensing and telemetry provide opportunities for assessing the effects of expanding extractive industries on animal populations. Here, we illustrate the applicability of resource selection functions (RSFs) for modelling wildlife habitat selection on indust...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Conservation
Main Authors: CRISTESCU, BOGDAN, STENHOUSE, GORDON B., SYMBALUK, MARC, NIELSEN, SCOTT E., BOYCE, MARK S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0376892916000217
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0376892916000217
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0376892916000217
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0376892916000217 2024-06-23T07:57:22+00:00 Wildlife habitat selection on landscapes with industrial disturbance CRISTESCU, BOGDAN STENHOUSE, GORDON B. SYMBALUK, MARC NIELSEN, SCOTT E. BOYCE, MARK S. 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0376892916000217 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0376892916000217 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Environmental Conservation volume 43, issue 4, page 327-336 ISSN 0376-8929 1469-4387 journal-article 2016 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892916000217 2024-06-05T04:04:14Z SUMMARY Technological advancements in remote sensing and telemetry provide opportunities for assessing the effects of expanding extractive industries on animal populations. Here, we illustrate the applicability of resource selection functions (RSFs) for modelling wildlife habitat selection on industrially-disturbed landscapes. We used grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) from a threatened population in Canada and surface mining as a case study. RSF predictions based on GPS radiocollared bears (n during mining = 7; n post mining = 9) showed that males and solitary females selected areas primarily outside mineral surface leases (MSLs) during active mining, and conversely inside MSLs after mine closure. However, females with cubs selected areas within compared to outside MSLs irrespective of mining activity. Individual variability was pronounced, although some environmental- and human-related variables were consistent across reproductive classes. For males and solitary females, regional-scale RSFs yielded comparable results to site-specific models, whereas for females with cubs, modelling the two scales produced divergent results. While mine reclamation may afford opportunities for bear persistence, managing public access will likely decrease the risk of human-caused bear mortality. RSFs are powerful tools that merit widespread use in quantitative and visual investigations of wildlife habitat selection on industrially-modified landscapes, using Geographic Information System layers that precisely characterize site-specific conditions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos Cambridge University Press Canada Environmental Conservation 43 4 327 336
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description SUMMARY Technological advancements in remote sensing and telemetry provide opportunities for assessing the effects of expanding extractive industries on animal populations. Here, we illustrate the applicability of resource selection functions (RSFs) for modelling wildlife habitat selection on industrially-disturbed landscapes. We used grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ) from a threatened population in Canada and surface mining as a case study. RSF predictions based on GPS radiocollared bears (n during mining = 7; n post mining = 9) showed that males and solitary females selected areas primarily outside mineral surface leases (MSLs) during active mining, and conversely inside MSLs after mine closure. However, females with cubs selected areas within compared to outside MSLs irrespective of mining activity. Individual variability was pronounced, although some environmental- and human-related variables were consistent across reproductive classes. For males and solitary females, regional-scale RSFs yielded comparable results to site-specific models, whereas for females with cubs, modelling the two scales produced divergent results. While mine reclamation may afford opportunities for bear persistence, managing public access will likely decrease the risk of human-caused bear mortality. RSFs are powerful tools that merit widespread use in quantitative and visual investigations of wildlife habitat selection on industrially-modified landscapes, using Geographic Information System layers that precisely characterize site-specific conditions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author CRISTESCU, BOGDAN
STENHOUSE, GORDON B.
SYMBALUK, MARC
NIELSEN, SCOTT E.
BOYCE, MARK S.
spellingShingle CRISTESCU, BOGDAN
STENHOUSE, GORDON B.
SYMBALUK, MARC
NIELSEN, SCOTT E.
BOYCE, MARK S.
Wildlife habitat selection on landscapes with industrial disturbance
author_facet CRISTESCU, BOGDAN
STENHOUSE, GORDON B.
SYMBALUK, MARC
NIELSEN, SCOTT E.
BOYCE, MARK S.
author_sort CRISTESCU, BOGDAN
title Wildlife habitat selection on landscapes with industrial disturbance
title_short Wildlife habitat selection on landscapes with industrial disturbance
title_full Wildlife habitat selection on landscapes with industrial disturbance
title_fullStr Wildlife habitat selection on landscapes with industrial disturbance
title_full_unstemmed Wildlife habitat selection on landscapes with industrial disturbance
title_sort wildlife habitat selection on landscapes with industrial disturbance
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0376892916000217
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0376892916000217
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_source Environmental Conservation
volume 43, issue 4, page 327-336
ISSN 0376-8929 1469-4387
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892916000217
container_title Environmental Conservation
container_volume 43
container_issue 4
container_start_page 327
op_container_end_page 336
_version_ 1802650964046381056