On the Anatomy of Prosthecocotyle torulosa (Linstow) and Prosthecocotyle heteroclita (Dies.)

In the Report on the Entozoa collected by H.M.S. “Challenger” Dr O. von Linstow described two new tapeworms, which he named Tetrabothrium torulosum and T. auriculatum . The resemblance of the head of T. auriculatum with that of Prosthecocotyle Forsteri described by Monticelli seemed to me to indicat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
Main Author: Fuhrmann, O
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1899
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0370164600051579
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0370164600051579
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0370164600051579
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0370164600051579 2024-03-03T08:44:29+00:00 On the Anatomy of Prosthecocotyle torulosa (Linstow) and Prosthecocotyle heteroclita (Dies.) Fuhrmann, O 1899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0370164600051579 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0370164600051579 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh volume 22, page 641-651 ISSN 0370-1646 General Engineering journal-article 1899 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0370164600051579 2024-02-08T08:28:17Z In the Report on the Entozoa collected by H.M.S. “Challenger” Dr O. von Linstow described two new tapeworms, which he named Tetrabothrium torulosum and T. auriculatum . The resemblance of the head of T. auriculatum with that of Prosthecocotyle Forsteri described by Monticelli seemed to me to indicate that the Tetrabothrium described by Linstow probably belonged to the genus Prosthecocotyle . Through the kindness of Sir John Murray, I received from the British Museum the original specimens for inspection, for which I wish to express here my warmest thanks. The following lines give the results of my examination; but before entering upon the description, let me say something on the systematic position of these two animals. As I have already remarked, Prof. Monticelli has rightly erected a new genus named Prosthecocotyle for the tapeworm Tœnia Forsteri , Krefft. To this genus belongs, besides P. Forsteri , other parasites of birds which have been placed in the genera Tœnia, Tetrabothrium, Amphoterocotyle, Bothridiotœnia, Bothriocephalus . According to my researches the following species belong to the genus Prosthecocotyle :— 1. P. Forsteri (Krefft), (syn. Tœnia Forsteri , Krefft), from Delphinus Forsteri (Gray) and Delphinus delphinus , L. 2. P. Monticellii , Fuhrmann (syn. Tœnia erostris, ex parte, Bothridiotœnia erostris , var. minor , Lönnberg), from Fulmarus glacialis , L. 3. P. umbrella , Fuhrmann, from Diomedea sp. (?). 4. P. torulosa (Linstow), (syn. Tetrabothrium torulosum , Linstow), from Diomedea brachyura , Temm. Article in Journal/Newspaper Fulmarus glacialis Cambridge University Press Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 22 641 651
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Engineering
spellingShingle General Engineering
Fuhrmann, O
On the Anatomy of Prosthecocotyle torulosa (Linstow) and Prosthecocotyle heteroclita (Dies.)
topic_facet General Engineering
description In the Report on the Entozoa collected by H.M.S. “Challenger” Dr O. von Linstow described two new tapeworms, which he named Tetrabothrium torulosum and T. auriculatum . The resemblance of the head of T. auriculatum with that of Prosthecocotyle Forsteri described by Monticelli seemed to me to indicate that the Tetrabothrium described by Linstow probably belonged to the genus Prosthecocotyle . Through the kindness of Sir John Murray, I received from the British Museum the original specimens for inspection, for which I wish to express here my warmest thanks. The following lines give the results of my examination; but before entering upon the description, let me say something on the systematic position of these two animals. As I have already remarked, Prof. Monticelli has rightly erected a new genus named Prosthecocotyle for the tapeworm Tœnia Forsteri , Krefft. To this genus belongs, besides P. Forsteri , other parasites of birds which have been placed in the genera Tœnia, Tetrabothrium, Amphoterocotyle, Bothridiotœnia, Bothriocephalus . According to my researches the following species belong to the genus Prosthecocotyle :— 1. P. Forsteri (Krefft), (syn. Tœnia Forsteri , Krefft), from Delphinus Forsteri (Gray) and Delphinus delphinus , L. 2. P. Monticellii , Fuhrmann (syn. Tœnia erostris, ex parte, Bothridiotœnia erostris , var. minor , Lönnberg), from Fulmarus glacialis , L. 3. P. umbrella , Fuhrmann, from Diomedea sp. (?). 4. P. torulosa (Linstow), (syn. Tetrabothrium torulosum , Linstow), from Diomedea brachyura , Temm.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Fuhrmann, O
author_facet Fuhrmann, O
author_sort Fuhrmann, O
title On the Anatomy of Prosthecocotyle torulosa (Linstow) and Prosthecocotyle heteroclita (Dies.)
title_short On the Anatomy of Prosthecocotyle torulosa (Linstow) and Prosthecocotyle heteroclita (Dies.)
title_full On the Anatomy of Prosthecocotyle torulosa (Linstow) and Prosthecocotyle heteroclita (Dies.)
title_fullStr On the Anatomy of Prosthecocotyle torulosa (Linstow) and Prosthecocotyle heteroclita (Dies.)
title_full_unstemmed On the Anatomy of Prosthecocotyle torulosa (Linstow) and Prosthecocotyle heteroclita (Dies.)
title_sort on the anatomy of prosthecocotyle torulosa (linstow) and prosthecocotyle heteroclita (dies.)
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1899
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0370164600051579
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0370164600051579
genre Fulmarus glacialis
genre_facet Fulmarus glacialis
op_source Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
volume 22, page 641-651
ISSN 0370-1646
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0370164600051579
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
container_volume 22
container_start_page 641
op_container_end_page 651
_version_ 1792499979504320512