Provincial Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes

Background: Outcomes must be measured as a first step toward improving performance. We sought to measure the national and provincial outcomes from carotid endarterectomy (CE) and explain provincial differences. Methods: We analyzed a large Canada-wide administrative hospital discharge database of al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Main Authors: Feasby, Thomas E., Quan, Hude, Ghali, William A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100002195
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0317167100002195
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0317167100002195
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0317167100002195 2024-03-03T08:46:44+00:00 Provincial Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes Feasby, Thomas E. Quan, Hude Ghali, William A. 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100002195 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0317167100002195 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques volume 29, issue 4, page 333-336 ISSN 0317-1671 2057-0155 Neurology (clinical) Neurology General Medicine journal-article 2002 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100002195 2024-02-08T08:38:40Z Background: Outcomes must be measured as a first step toward improving performance. We sought to measure the national and provincial outcomes from carotid endarterectomy (CE) and explain provincial differences. Methods: We analyzed a large Canada-wide administrative hospital discharge database of all patients, except those in Québec, receiving CE in 1994-1997 and used logistic regression for risk adjustment to measure adverse outcomes nationally and by province. Our main outcome measures were in-hospital stroke and/or death. Results: A total of 14,268 patients underwent CE in the years 1994-1997. The overall death rate was 1.3% and the combined stroke and/or death rate was 4.1%. There was a trend towards improvement over the four years. The provinces of Saskatchewan and Newfoundland had significantly higher adverse event rates for the risk-adjusted combined outcome measure. Conclusion: The outcome of CE in Canada is good and showed improvement over four years. However, significant differences in provincial outcomes were found. This suggests that regionalization across provincial boundaries may be needed to promote higher surgeon and hospital case volumes and thus improve outcomes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland Cambridge University Press Canada Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques 29 4 333 336
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Neurology (clinical)
Neurology
General Medicine
spellingShingle Neurology (clinical)
Neurology
General Medicine
Feasby, Thomas E.
Quan, Hude
Ghali, William A.
Provincial Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes
topic_facet Neurology (clinical)
Neurology
General Medicine
description Background: Outcomes must be measured as a first step toward improving performance. We sought to measure the national and provincial outcomes from carotid endarterectomy (CE) and explain provincial differences. Methods: We analyzed a large Canada-wide administrative hospital discharge database of all patients, except those in Québec, receiving CE in 1994-1997 and used logistic regression for risk adjustment to measure adverse outcomes nationally and by province. Our main outcome measures were in-hospital stroke and/or death. Results: A total of 14,268 patients underwent CE in the years 1994-1997. The overall death rate was 1.3% and the combined stroke and/or death rate was 4.1%. There was a trend towards improvement over the four years. The provinces of Saskatchewan and Newfoundland had significantly higher adverse event rates for the risk-adjusted combined outcome measure. Conclusion: The outcome of CE in Canada is good and showed improvement over four years. However, significant differences in provincial outcomes were found. This suggests that regionalization across provincial boundaries may be needed to promote higher surgeon and hospital case volumes and thus improve outcomes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Feasby, Thomas E.
Quan, Hude
Ghali, William A.
author_facet Feasby, Thomas E.
Quan, Hude
Ghali, William A.
author_sort Feasby, Thomas E.
title Provincial Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes
title_short Provincial Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes
title_full Provincial Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes
title_fullStr Provincial Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Provincial Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes
title_sort provincial carotid endarterectomy outcomes
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100002195
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0317167100002195
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_source Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
volume 29, issue 4, page 333-336
ISSN 0317-1671 2057-0155
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100002195
container_title Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
container_volume 29
container_issue 4
container_start_page 333
op_container_end_page 336
_version_ 1792502783499304960