OP134 Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Decisions And Access To Anticancer Treatments In Canada

• Published in: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
• Main Authors: Singh, Ambrish, Hussain, Salman
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2018
• Subjects: Health Policy; Newfoundland; Canada; British Columbia; Prince Edward Island
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462318001526; https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0266462318001526

Introduction: The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) plays an important role in public reimbursement decision-making for oncology drugs in Canada. This research studies the relation of positive pCODR decisions to new cancer treatment and their subsequent inclusion in Canada's public drug plans. Methods: We studied all oncology drugs that received an approval from Health Canada and were reviewed by the pCODR from inception till 26th Sep, 2017. The data was obtained from CADTH and Health Canada. Data such as indication, submission type and date, recommendation date, final recommendation, and subsequent provincial funding status was extracted and analyzed. Impact was evaluated by analyzing the percentage of drug submissions with assessment outcome (positive recommendation rate and conditional recommendation rate) and time taken for the final decision (recommendation gap). The percentage of drugs included in public formulary after positive recommendation by pCODR (coverage rate) and the gap in days from positive recommendation to subsequent coverage in provinces (coverage gap) was also assessed. Results: Among 119 drugs reviewed by pCODR, the positive recommendation rate was eight percent. Nine applications comprising seven drugs for six indications received positive recommendations, and genitourinary treatments received maximum positive recommendations. The conditional recommendation rate was 52 percent; 62 applications of 45 drugs for 46 indications received conditional recommendation. Lymphoma and myeloma treatments received maximum conditional recommendations. The average recommendation gap for positive and conditional recommendations was 180 and 172 days, respectively. The coverage rate for drugs with positive recommendation was 100 percent for all provinces except 89 percent for Newfoundland and Labrador, and 67 percent for Prince Edward Island. Among the provinces, British Columbia had a maximum of 433 days and Saskatchewan has the minimum of ...