Baylis on post-war planning
In a recent issue of the Review John Baylis discussed wartime thinking in Great Britain about a post-war European security group. Baylis's contribution is of great importance to the historiography of wartime and post-war British foreign and security policy, filling a void in our knowledge of th...
Published in: | Review of International Studies |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
1984
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500116249 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260210500116249 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0260210500116249 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0260210500116249 2024-03-03T08:47:05+00:00 Baylis on post-war planning Wiebes, Cees Zeeman, Bert 1984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500116249 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260210500116249 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Review of International Studies volume 10, issue 3, page 247-250 ISSN 0260-2105 1469-9044 Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science journal-article 1984 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500116249 2024-02-08T08:37:52Z In a recent issue of the Review John Baylis discussed wartime thinking in Great Britain about a post-war European security group. Baylis's contribution is of great importance to the historiography of wartime and post-war British foreign and security policy, filling a void in our knowledge of these crucial years. However, we would like to make some critical comments on his treatment of the Post-Hostilities Planning Staff report ‘Security in Western Europe and the North Atlantic’, which is such a central feature in his contribution. According to Baylis this particular study by the PHPS (an interdepartmental study group created by the British War Cabinet) laid down ‘a reasonably coherent set of attitudes’ regarding post-war European co-operation. The PHPS, collecting together much of the current thinking in both Foreign Office and military circles, advocated the formation of a Western European-Group as a kind of insurance against a rearmed Germany ors if the world organization failed to materialize, against a potentially hostile USSR. The report marked the formation of a ‘consensus’ among Foreign Office and military officials involved in post-war planning. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Cambridge University Press Review of International Studies 10 3 247 250 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
topic |
Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science |
spellingShingle |
Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science Wiebes, Cees Zeeman, Bert Baylis on post-war planning |
topic_facet |
Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science |
description |
In a recent issue of the Review John Baylis discussed wartime thinking in Great Britain about a post-war European security group. Baylis's contribution is of great importance to the historiography of wartime and post-war British foreign and security policy, filling a void in our knowledge of these crucial years. However, we would like to make some critical comments on his treatment of the Post-Hostilities Planning Staff report ‘Security in Western Europe and the North Atlantic’, which is such a central feature in his contribution. According to Baylis this particular study by the PHPS (an interdepartmental study group created by the British War Cabinet) laid down ‘a reasonably coherent set of attitudes’ regarding post-war European co-operation. The PHPS, collecting together much of the current thinking in both Foreign Office and military circles, advocated the formation of a Western European-Group as a kind of insurance against a rearmed Germany ors if the world organization failed to materialize, against a potentially hostile USSR. The report marked the formation of a ‘consensus’ among Foreign Office and military officials involved in post-war planning. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Wiebes, Cees Zeeman, Bert |
author_facet |
Wiebes, Cees Zeeman, Bert |
author_sort |
Wiebes, Cees |
title |
Baylis on post-war planning |
title_short |
Baylis on post-war planning |
title_full |
Baylis on post-war planning |
title_fullStr |
Baylis on post-war planning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Baylis on post-war planning |
title_sort |
baylis on post-war planning |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
1984 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500116249 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260210500116249 |
genre |
North Atlantic |
genre_facet |
North Atlantic |
op_source |
Review of International Studies volume 10, issue 3, page 247-250 ISSN 0260-2105 1469-9044 |
op_rights |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500116249 |
container_title |
Review of International Studies |
container_volume |
10 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
247 |
op_container_end_page |
250 |
_version_ |
1792503228296855552 |