Cetacean science does not have to be pseudo-science

Rendall and Whitehead overstate the weak evidence for social learning in cetaceans as a group, including the current evidence for vocal learning in killer whales. Ethnographic techniques exist to test genetic explanations of killer whale calling behavior, and additional captive experiments are feasi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Main Author: Miller, Patrick J. O.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01473961
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0140525X01473961
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0140525x01473961
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0140525x01473961 2024-03-03T08:46:15+00:00 Cetacean science does not have to be pseudo-science Miller, Patrick J. O. 2001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01473961 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0140525X01473961 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Behavioral and Brain Sciences volume 24, issue 2, page 347-348 ISSN 0140-525X 1469-1825 Behavioral Neuroscience Physiology Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology journal-article 2001 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01473961 2024-02-08T08:35:54Z Rendall and Whitehead overstate the weak evidence for social learning in cetaceans as a group, including the current evidence for vocal learning in killer whales. Ethnographic techniques exist to test genetic explanations of killer whale calling behavior, and additional captive experiments are feasible. Without such tests, descriptions of learning could be considered pseudo-scientific, ad hoc auxiliary assumptions of an untested theory. Article in Journal/Newspaper Killer Whale Killer whale Cambridge University Press Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 2 347 348
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Behavioral Neuroscience
Physiology
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
spellingShingle Behavioral Neuroscience
Physiology
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Miller, Patrick J. O.
Cetacean science does not have to be pseudo-science
topic_facet Behavioral Neuroscience
Physiology
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
description Rendall and Whitehead overstate the weak evidence for social learning in cetaceans as a group, including the current evidence for vocal learning in killer whales. Ethnographic techniques exist to test genetic explanations of killer whale calling behavior, and additional captive experiments are feasible. Without such tests, descriptions of learning could be considered pseudo-scientific, ad hoc auxiliary assumptions of an untested theory.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Miller, Patrick J. O.
author_facet Miller, Patrick J. O.
author_sort Miller, Patrick J. O.
title Cetacean science does not have to be pseudo-science
title_short Cetacean science does not have to be pseudo-science
title_full Cetacean science does not have to be pseudo-science
title_fullStr Cetacean science does not have to be pseudo-science
title_full_unstemmed Cetacean science does not have to be pseudo-science
title_sort cetacean science does not have to be pseudo-science
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01473961
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0140525X01473961
genre Killer Whale
Killer whale
genre_facet Killer Whale
Killer whale
op_source Behavioral and Brain Sciences
volume 24, issue 2, page 347-348
ISSN 0140-525X 1469-1825
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01473961
container_title Behavioral and Brain Sciences
container_volume 24
container_issue 2
container_start_page 347
op_container_end_page 348
_version_ 1792502238182113280