Differences between evolution of mean form and evolution of new morphotypes: an example from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera

Morphological evolution in the Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Contusotruncana lineage of planktonic foraminifera was studied at DSDP Sites 525 (South Atlantic) and 384 (North Atlantic). A multivariable approach was used to separate aspects of form controlled by geographical variation (size, spiral...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paleobiology
Main Authors: Kucera, Michal, Malmgren, Björn A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300019965
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0094837300019965
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0094837300019965
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0094837300019965 2024-05-12T08:08:09+00:00 Differences between evolution of mean form and evolution of new morphotypes: an example from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera Kucera, Michal Malmgren, Björn A. 1998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300019965 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0094837300019965 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Paleobiology volume 24, issue 1, page 49-63 ISSN 0094-8373 1938-5331 Paleontology General Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 1998 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300019965 2024-04-18T06:54:01Z Morphological evolution in the Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Contusotruncana lineage of planktonic foraminifera was studied at DSDP Sites 525 (South Atlantic) and 384 (North Atlantic). A multivariable approach was used to separate aspects of form controlled by geographical variation (size, spiral roundness of the test, percentage of kummerform specimens) from those due to changes that occurred simultaneously in geographically distant populations of the lineage (shell conicity, number of chambers in the last whorl). A gradual increase in mean shell conicity was observed over the last 3 million years of the Cretaceous. It arose from the combination of a rapid development of highly conical shells after 68.5 Ma and a long-term trend of progressive disappearance of the ancestral morphotype. Therefore, despite the gradual change in “mean form,” the morphological evolution in the Contusotruncana lineage differs from the classical image of phyletic gradualism. The gradual increase in mean shell conicity in the lineage was accompanied by a remarkable decrease in its absolute abundance (shell accumulation rate), suggesting that the changes in shell morphology might not have been neutral with respect to natural selection. Apparently, gradual change in “mean form” of fossil lineages does not require an equally gradual development of morphological novelties. It may be caused by natural selection operating on a constant range of variation in populations living in environments without geographical barriers. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Planktonic foraminifera Cambridge University Press Paleobiology 24 1 49 63
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Paleontology
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Paleontology
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Kucera, Michal
Malmgren, Björn A.
Differences between evolution of mean form and evolution of new morphotypes: an example from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera
topic_facet Paleontology
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Morphological evolution in the Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Contusotruncana lineage of planktonic foraminifera was studied at DSDP Sites 525 (South Atlantic) and 384 (North Atlantic). A multivariable approach was used to separate aspects of form controlled by geographical variation (size, spiral roundness of the test, percentage of kummerform specimens) from those due to changes that occurred simultaneously in geographically distant populations of the lineage (shell conicity, number of chambers in the last whorl). A gradual increase in mean shell conicity was observed over the last 3 million years of the Cretaceous. It arose from the combination of a rapid development of highly conical shells after 68.5 Ma and a long-term trend of progressive disappearance of the ancestral morphotype. Therefore, despite the gradual change in “mean form,” the morphological evolution in the Contusotruncana lineage differs from the classical image of phyletic gradualism. The gradual increase in mean shell conicity in the lineage was accompanied by a remarkable decrease in its absolute abundance (shell accumulation rate), suggesting that the changes in shell morphology might not have been neutral with respect to natural selection. Apparently, gradual change in “mean form” of fossil lineages does not require an equally gradual development of morphological novelties. It may be caused by natural selection operating on a constant range of variation in populations living in environments without geographical barriers.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kucera, Michal
Malmgren, Björn A.
author_facet Kucera, Michal
Malmgren, Björn A.
author_sort Kucera, Michal
title Differences between evolution of mean form and evolution of new morphotypes: an example from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera
title_short Differences between evolution of mean form and evolution of new morphotypes: an example from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera
title_full Differences between evolution of mean form and evolution of new morphotypes: an example from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera
title_fullStr Differences between evolution of mean form and evolution of new morphotypes: an example from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera
title_full_unstemmed Differences between evolution of mean form and evolution of new morphotypes: an example from Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera
title_sort differences between evolution of mean form and evolution of new morphotypes: an example from late cretaceous planktonic foraminifera
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1998
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300019965
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0094837300019965
genre North Atlantic
Planktonic foraminifera
genre_facet North Atlantic
Planktonic foraminifera
op_source Paleobiology
volume 24, issue 1, page 49-63
ISSN 0094-8373 1938-5331
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300019965
container_title Paleobiology
container_volume 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
op_container_end_page 63
_version_ 1798851058606276608