Macroevolutionary differences between the two major clades of Neogene planktonic foraminifera

Being of especially high quality, the Neogene fossil record of planktonic foraminifera offers special opportunities for assessing patterns of extinction and speciation. A variety of metrics indicates that within this group the mean duration of lineages has been much shorter (rate of extinction has b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paleobiology
Main Authors: Stanley, Steven M., Wetmore, Karen L., Kennett, James P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300011970
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0094837300011970
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0094837300011970
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0094837300011970 2024-09-15T18:30:53+00:00 Macroevolutionary differences between the two major clades of Neogene planktonic foraminifera Stanley, Steven M. Wetmore, Karen L. Kennett, James P. 1988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300011970 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0094837300011970 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Paleobiology volume 14, issue 3, page 235-249 ISSN 0094-8373 1938-5331 journal-article 1988 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300011970 2024-07-31T04:03:36Z Being of especially high quality, the Neogene fossil record of planktonic foraminifera offers special opportunities for assessing patterns of extinction and speciation. A variety of metrics indicates that within this group the mean duration of lineages has been much shorter (rate of extinction has been higher) for the globorotaliid clade than for the globigerinid clade. Furthermore, in the globorotaliid clade rates of extinction and speciation have not been closely linked to changes in diversity, but rather have been relatively high even at times when diversity has undergone little change. Thus, the globorotaliid clade has undergone more rapid evolutionary turnover than the globigerinid clade. Data for living species reveal that neither geographic range nor temperature tolerance is the primary factor controlling lineage duration. On the other hand, there is evidence that lineages marked by low abundance (small population size) are relatively short-lived. The reason that globorotaliid lineages have generally survived for shorter intervals, on the average, may be that their populations have been less abundant and less stable. Usually they live deeper in the water column, where food is often sparse, and many flourish only in areas of upwelling. Furthermore, the globorotaliids lack symbiotic algae for nutritional support. The same ecological factors may have accelerated speciation in the globorotaliid clade, by causing species to be patchily distributed. Thus, population size and structure have been more important than geographic range in determining rates of extinction and speciation. This parallels the situation for Neogene marine bivalves. For planktonic foraminifera, as for Western Atlantic Bivalvia, the normal pattern of extinction was reversed in late Pliocene time, apparently in response to climatic cooling. The globigerinids suffered a sudden pulse of extinction. The deeper dwelling globorotaliids fared better; probably many of their species benefited from elevation of the seasonal thermocline into the ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Planktonic foraminifera Cambridge University Press Paleobiology 14 3 235 249
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Being of especially high quality, the Neogene fossil record of planktonic foraminifera offers special opportunities for assessing patterns of extinction and speciation. A variety of metrics indicates that within this group the mean duration of lineages has been much shorter (rate of extinction has been higher) for the globorotaliid clade than for the globigerinid clade. Furthermore, in the globorotaliid clade rates of extinction and speciation have not been closely linked to changes in diversity, but rather have been relatively high even at times when diversity has undergone little change. Thus, the globorotaliid clade has undergone more rapid evolutionary turnover than the globigerinid clade. Data for living species reveal that neither geographic range nor temperature tolerance is the primary factor controlling lineage duration. On the other hand, there is evidence that lineages marked by low abundance (small population size) are relatively short-lived. The reason that globorotaliid lineages have generally survived for shorter intervals, on the average, may be that their populations have been less abundant and less stable. Usually they live deeper in the water column, where food is often sparse, and many flourish only in areas of upwelling. Furthermore, the globorotaliids lack symbiotic algae for nutritional support. The same ecological factors may have accelerated speciation in the globorotaliid clade, by causing species to be patchily distributed. Thus, population size and structure have been more important than geographic range in determining rates of extinction and speciation. This parallels the situation for Neogene marine bivalves. For planktonic foraminifera, as for Western Atlantic Bivalvia, the normal pattern of extinction was reversed in late Pliocene time, apparently in response to climatic cooling. The globigerinids suffered a sudden pulse of extinction. The deeper dwelling globorotaliids fared better; probably many of their species benefited from elevation of the seasonal thermocline into the ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stanley, Steven M.
Wetmore, Karen L.
Kennett, James P.
spellingShingle Stanley, Steven M.
Wetmore, Karen L.
Kennett, James P.
Macroevolutionary differences between the two major clades of Neogene planktonic foraminifera
author_facet Stanley, Steven M.
Wetmore, Karen L.
Kennett, James P.
author_sort Stanley, Steven M.
title Macroevolutionary differences between the two major clades of Neogene planktonic foraminifera
title_short Macroevolutionary differences between the two major clades of Neogene planktonic foraminifera
title_full Macroevolutionary differences between the two major clades of Neogene planktonic foraminifera
title_fullStr Macroevolutionary differences between the two major clades of Neogene planktonic foraminifera
title_full_unstemmed Macroevolutionary differences between the two major clades of Neogene planktonic foraminifera
title_sort macroevolutionary differences between the two major clades of neogene planktonic foraminifera
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1988
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300011970
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0094837300011970
genre Planktonic foraminifera
genre_facet Planktonic foraminifera
op_source Paleobiology
volume 14, issue 3, page 235-249
ISSN 0094-8373 1938-5331
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300011970
container_title Paleobiology
container_volume 14
container_issue 3
container_start_page 235
op_container_end_page 249
_version_ 1810472433431347200