Prehistoric Social Groups in North Norway

‘They have accused the archaeologist of tatting endless taxonomic rosettes of the I same old ball of “material culture” and maintained that his findings are next to useless for the purpose of history and culture study. It seems that the archaeologists are becoming as Tolstoy once said of modern hist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society
Main Author: Gjessing, Gutorm
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1956
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0079497x00017448
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0079497X00017448
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0079497x00017448
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0079497x00017448 2024-03-03T08:47:13+00:00 Prehistoric Social Groups in North Norway Gjessing, Gutorm 1956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0079497x00017448 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0079497X00017448 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society volume 21, page 84-92 ISSN 0079-497X 2050-2729 General Medicine journal-article 1956 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0079497x00017448 2024-02-08T08:38:27Z ‘They have accused the archaeologist of tatting endless taxonomic rosettes of the I same old ball of “material culture” and maintained that his findings are next to useless for the purpose of history and culture study. It seems that the archaeologists are becoming as Tolstoy once said of modern historians, like deaf men answering questions which no one has asked them. In their broader implications these accusations are all too true’ (Taylor, 1948, p. 95). Certainly this not too kind, ironical remark was explicitly aimed at archaeologists in the United States; yet it may, perhaps, be suspected that even some of their European colleagues feel somewhat uneasy on being confronted by such an unflattering mirror. One has, undoubtedly, the feeling that relatively few archaeologists in the West have ever really scrutinized critically what they and their field of study are ultimately aiming at, apart from the somewhat loose and undefined aim of ‘reconstructing the past’. Now, this ‘past’ obviously does not consist of ‘taxonomic rosettes’ for their own sake, nor of economic techniques only. There can be little doubt of the validity of V. Gordon Childe's remark that the cultures established by archaeology represent societies, and in other of his writings, most explicitly in his intriguing book, Social Evolution (Childe, 1951), he has laid down the foundations of a ‘socio-archaeology’. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Norway Cambridge University Press Norway Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 21 84 92
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Medicine
spellingShingle General Medicine
Gjessing, Gutorm
Prehistoric Social Groups in North Norway
topic_facet General Medicine
description ‘They have accused the archaeologist of tatting endless taxonomic rosettes of the I same old ball of “material culture” and maintained that his findings are next to useless for the purpose of history and culture study. It seems that the archaeologists are becoming as Tolstoy once said of modern historians, like deaf men answering questions which no one has asked them. In their broader implications these accusations are all too true’ (Taylor, 1948, p. 95). Certainly this not too kind, ironical remark was explicitly aimed at archaeologists in the United States; yet it may, perhaps, be suspected that even some of their European colleagues feel somewhat uneasy on being confronted by such an unflattering mirror. One has, undoubtedly, the feeling that relatively few archaeologists in the West have ever really scrutinized critically what they and their field of study are ultimately aiming at, apart from the somewhat loose and undefined aim of ‘reconstructing the past’. Now, this ‘past’ obviously does not consist of ‘taxonomic rosettes’ for their own sake, nor of economic techniques only. There can be little doubt of the validity of V. Gordon Childe's remark that the cultures established by archaeology represent societies, and in other of his writings, most explicitly in his intriguing book, Social Evolution (Childe, 1951), he has laid down the foundations of a ‘socio-archaeology’.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gjessing, Gutorm
author_facet Gjessing, Gutorm
author_sort Gjessing, Gutorm
title Prehistoric Social Groups in North Norway
title_short Prehistoric Social Groups in North Norway
title_full Prehistoric Social Groups in North Norway
title_fullStr Prehistoric Social Groups in North Norway
title_full_unstemmed Prehistoric Social Groups in North Norway
title_sort prehistoric social groups in north norway
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1956
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0079497x00017448
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0079497X00017448
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre North Norway
genre_facet North Norway
op_source Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society
volume 21, page 84-92
ISSN 0079-497X 2050-2729
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0079497x00017448
container_title Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society
container_volume 21
container_start_page 84
op_container_end_page 92
_version_ 1792503376730128384