A Spinozistic Vision of God
Philosophers of today are easy to stupefy. Try suggesting that some situations, such as enjoying a chess problem, really are in themselves better than others such as being burned alive: in themselves better in the sense that situations of the first sort would be preferable to those of the second if...
Published in: | Religious Studies |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
1993
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412500022332 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0034412500022332 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0034412500022332 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0034412500022332 2024-03-03T08:45:43+00:00 A Spinozistic Vision of God Leslie, John 1993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412500022332 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0034412500022332 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Religious Studies volume 29, issue 3, page 277-285 ISSN 0034-4125 1469-901X Philosophy Religious studies journal-article 1993 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412500022332 2024-02-08T08:45:09Z Philosophers of today are easy to stupefy. Try suggesting that some situations, such as enjoying a chess problem, really are in themselves better than others such as being burned alive: in themselves better in the sense that situations of the first sort would be preferable to those of the second if they existed all alone, so that one did not need to take consequences into account, and really better much as Africa is really bigger than Iceland, so that talk of real betterness is not just a genuine, wholehearted act of prescribing, or an expression of personal taste like the remark that mustard really is nasty. You will stupefy many a philosopher. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Cambridge University Press Religious Studies 29 3 277 285 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
topic |
Philosophy Religious studies |
spellingShingle |
Philosophy Religious studies Leslie, John A Spinozistic Vision of God |
topic_facet |
Philosophy Religious studies |
description |
Philosophers of today are easy to stupefy. Try suggesting that some situations, such as enjoying a chess problem, really are in themselves better than others such as being burned alive: in themselves better in the sense that situations of the first sort would be preferable to those of the second if they existed all alone, so that one did not need to take consequences into account, and really better much as Africa is really bigger than Iceland, so that talk of real betterness is not just a genuine, wholehearted act of prescribing, or an expression of personal taste like the remark that mustard really is nasty. You will stupefy many a philosopher. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Leslie, John |
author_facet |
Leslie, John |
author_sort |
Leslie, John |
title |
A Spinozistic Vision of God |
title_short |
A Spinozistic Vision of God |
title_full |
A Spinozistic Vision of God |
title_fullStr |
A Spinozistic Vision of God |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Spinozistic Vision of God |
title_sort |
spinozistic vision of god |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
1993 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412500022332 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0034412500022332 |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
Religious Studies volume 29, issue 3, page 277-285 ISSN 0034-4125 1469-901X |
op_rights |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412500022332 |
container_title |
Religious Studies |
container_volume |
29 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
277 |
op_container_end_page |
285 |
_version_ |
1792501369708478464 |