Extension of the 14 C Calibration Curve to ca. 40,000 Cal BC by Synchronizing Greenland 18 0/ 16 O Ice Core Records and North Atlantic Foraminifera Profiles: A Comparison with U/Th Coral Data

For a better understanding of pre-Holocene cultural history, archaeologists are in need of an absolute time scale that can be confirmed and duplicated by different dating methods. Proxy data available from archaeological sites do not, in themselves, allow much reflection on absolute age. Even when f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiocarbon
Main Authors: Jöris, Olaf, Weninger, Bernhard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200018373
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0033822200018373
_version_ 1847706246832979968
author Jöris, Olaf
Weninger, Bernhard
author_facet Jöris, Olaf
Weninger, Bernhard
author_sort Jöris, Olaf
collection Cambridge University Press
container_issue 1
container_start_page 495
container_title Radiocarbon
container_volume 40
description For a better understanding of pre-Holocene cultural history, archaeologists are in need of an absolute time scale that can be confirmed and duplicated by different dating methods. Proxy data available from archaeological sites do not, in themselves, allow much reflection on absolute age. Even when founded on supporting radiocarbon data, Paleolithic chronologies that are beyond the actual limits of 14 C calibration still remain relative ones, and thus are often quite tentative. Lacking the possibility of calibration for the Paleolithic, archaeologists often attempt to correlate their data with different time scales from different archives that are thought to be absolute or calendric. The main result of this paper is that the GISP2 and U/Th chronologies duplicate each other over their entire range of data overlap, while other time scales ( i.e. , GRIP, most varve sites) differ significantly. The context-derived 14 C calibration curve provides a large potential to correlate the various climate archives as recorded in ice cores and deep ocean drillings with terrestrial sequences.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Greenland
GRIP
ice core
North Atlantic
genre_facet Greenland
GRIP
ice core
North Atlantic
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0033822200018373
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
op_container_end_page 504
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200018373
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_source Radiocarbon
volume 40, issue 1, page 495-504
ISSN 0033-8222 1945-5755
publishDate 1997
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0033822200018373 2025-11-02T15:09:33+00:00 Extension of the 14 C Calibration Curve to ca. 40,000 Cal BC by Synchronizing Greenland 18 0/ 16 O Ice Core Records and North Atlantic Foraminifera Profiles: A Comparison with U/Th Coral Data Jöris, Olaf Weninger, Bernhard 1997 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200018373 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0033822200018373 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Radiocarbon volume 40, issue 1, page 495-504 ISSN 0033-8222 1945-5755 journal-article 1997 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200018373 2025-10-09T16:21:46Z For a better understanding of pre-Holocene cultural history, archaeologists are in need of an absolute time scale that can be confirmed and duplicated by different dating methods. Proxy data available from archaeological sites do not, in themselves, allow much reflection on absolute age. Even when founded on supporting radiocarbon data, Paleolithic chronologies that are beyond the actual limits of 14 C calibration still remain relative ones, and thus are often quite tentative. Lacking the possibility of calibration for the Paleolithic, archaeologists often attempt to correlate their data with different time scales from different archives that are thought to be absolute or calendric. The main result of this paper is that the GISP2 and U/Th chronologies duplicate each other over their entire range of data overlap, while other time scales ( i.e. , GRIP, most varve sites) differ significantly. The context-derived 14 C calibration curve provides a large potential to correlate the various climate archives as recorded in ice cores and deep ocean drillings with terrestrial sequences. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland GRIP ice core North Atlantic Cambridge University Press Greenland Radiocarbon 40 1 495 504
spellingShingle Jöris, Olaf
Weninger, Bernhard
Extension of the 14 C Calibration Curve to ca. 40,000 Cal BC by Synchronizing Greenland 18 0/ 16 O Ice Core Records and North Atlantic Foraminifera Profiles: A Comparison with U/Th Coral Data
title Extension of the 14 C Calibration Curve to ca. 40,000 Cal BC by Synchronizing Greenland 18 0/ 16 O Ice Core Records and North Atlantic Foraminifera Profiles: A Comparison with U/Th Coral Data
title_full Extension of the 14 C Calibration Curve to ca. 40,000 Cal BC by Synchronizing Greenland 18 0/ 16 O Ice Core Records and North Atlantic Foraminifera Profiles: A Comparison with U/Th Coral Data
title_fullStr Extension of the 14 C Calibration Curve to ca. 40,000 Cal BC by Synchronizing Greenland 18 0/ 16 O Ice Core Records and North Atlantic Foraminifera Profiles: A Comparison with U/Th Coral Data
title_full_unstemmed Extension of the 14 C Calibration Curve to ca. 40,000 Cal BC by Synchronizing Greenland 18 0/ 16 O Ice Core Records and North Atlantic Foraminifera Profiles: A Comparison with U/Th Coral Data
title_short Extension of the 14 C Calibration Curve to ca. 40,000 Cal BC by Synchronizing Greenland 18 0/ 16 O Ice Core Records and North Atlantic Foraminifera Profiles: A Comparison with U/Th Coral Data
title_sort extension of the 14 c calibration curve to ca. 40,000 cal bc by synchronizing greenland 18 0/ 16 o ice core records and north atlantic foraminifera profiles: a comparison with u/th coral data
url https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200018373
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0033822200018373