Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?

Abstract Recent years have shown that international science dialogue exists at the edge of turbulence and is disturbed by different geopolitical events. The notion of science diplomacy has taken the critical discourse to different levels of actors. Such a discourse exposes the epistemological ambiva...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Authors: Zaika, Yulia, Lagutina, Maria
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000141
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247423000141
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247423000141
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247423000141 2024-03-03T08:40:59+00:00 Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue? Zaika, Yulia Lagutina, Maria 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000141 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247423000141 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 59 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 General Earth and Planetary Sciences Ecology Geography, Planning and Development journal-article 2023 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000141 2024-02-08T08:41:14Z Abstract Recent years have shown that international science dialogue exists at the edge of turbulence and is disturbed by different geopolitical events. The notion of science diplomacy has taken the critical discourse to different levels of actors. Such a discourse exposes the epistemological ambivalence and methodological imbalance of both science and diplomacy in this phenomenon. Current geopolitical conditions have revealed new edges of science diplomacy instruments that spread from “soft” to “hard” practices. Different levels of dialogue and cooperation have shown different examples of resilience and adaptability (or the opposite) to the external turbulence. The phenomenon of regionalisation in science diplomacy is facing criticism from the science community while the current geopolitical situation has dramatically influenced the Arctic science dialogue, as well as governance practices. This commentary discusses particular examples of existing Arctic science diplomacy practices in current geopolitical conditions which are reflected in the Arctic theoretical and practical discourse. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Polar Record Cambridge University Press Arctic Polar Record 59
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Zaika, Yulia
Lagutina, Maria
Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
description Abstract Recent years have shown that international science dialogue exists at the edge of turbulence and is disturbed by different geopolitical events. The notion of science diplomacy has taken the critical discourse to different levels of actors. Such a discourse exposes the epistemological ambivalence and methodological imbalance of both science and diplomacy in this phenomenon. Current geopolitical conditions have revealed new edges of science diplomacy instruments that spread from “soft” to “hard” practices. Different levels of dialogue and cooperation have shown different examples of resilience and adaptability (or the opposite) to the external turbulence. The phenomenon of regionalisation in science diplomacy is facing criticism from the science community while the current geopolitical situation has dramatically influenced the Arctic science dialogue, as well as governance practices. This commentary discusses particular examples of existing Arctic science diplomacy practices in current geopolitical conditions which are reflected in the Arctic theoretical and practical discourse.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Zaika, Yulia
Lagutina, Maria
author_facet Zaika, Yulia
Lagutina, Maria
author_sort Zaika, Yulia
title Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?
title_short Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?
title_full Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?
title_fullStr Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?
title_full_unstemmed Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?
title_sort arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: from “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000141
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247423000141
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Polar Record
genre_facet Arctic
Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 59
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000141
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 59
_version_ 1792496746848321536