Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
Abstract Dominant geopolitical narratives on the Arctic argue that the region is either edging towards conflict or international law is respected and peace is maintained through cooperation to address shared concerns. While both of these narratives are present in the Arctic states’ strategies, most...
Published in: | Polar Record |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247422000183 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247422000183 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247422000183 2024-09-15T18:31:19+00:00 Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies Everett, Karen Halašková, Barbora 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247422000183 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Polar Record volume 58 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 journal-article 2022 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183 2024-07-31T04:04:47Z Abstract Dominant geopolitical narratives on the Arctic argue that the region is either edging towards conflict or international law is respected and peace is maintained through cooperation to address shared concerns. While both of these narratives are present in the Arctic states’ strategies, most of them tend to support collaborative efforts. Science diplomacy (SD) is a useful mechanism in this regard as it helps states overcome potential disagreements and can stimulate cooperation in other areas. Given the growing concerns about global risks, SD is more important now than ever before. In our study, we identify and focus on three indicators for potential SD in the Arctic strategies: i) scientific infrastructure; ii) membership in intergovernmental/interparliamentary and scientific/education organisations and networks and iii) specific areas of scientific cooperation. Considering the intensive scientific activity in the region, it is not surprising that the strategies discuss different forms of research and scientific cooperation, although none explicitly use the term “science diplomacy”. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals the Arctic states do apply the SD concept in their strategies and use three types of diplomacy – science in diplomacy , science for diplomacy or diplomacy for science – in the three indicators. Article in Journal/Newspaper Polar Record Cambridge University Press Polar Record 58 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
description |
Abstract Dominant geopolitical narratives on the Arctic argue that the region is either edging towards conflict or international law is respected and peace is maintained through cooperation to address shared concerns. While both of these narratives are present in the Arctic states’ strategies, most of them tend to support collaborative efforts. Science diplomacy (SD) is a useful mechanism in this regard as it helps states overcome potential disagreements and can stimulate cooperation in other areas. Given the growing concerns about global risks, SD is more important now than ever before. In our study, we identify and focus on three indicators for potential SD in the Arctic strategies: i) scientific infrastructure; ii) membership in intergovernmental/interparliamentary and scientific/education organisations and networks and iii) specific areas of scientific cooperation. Considering the intensive scientific activity in the region, it is not surprising that the strategies discuss different forms of research and scientific cooperation, although none explicitly use the term “science diplomacy”. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals the Arctic states do apply the SD concept in their strategies and use three types of diplomacy – science in diplomacy , science for diplomacy or diplomacy for science – in the three indicators. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Everett, Karen Halašková, Barbora |
spellingShingle |
Everett, Karen Halašková, Barbora Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies |
author_facet |
Everett, Karen Halašková, Barbora |
author_sort |
Everett, Karen |
title |
Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies |
title_short |
Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies |
title_full |
Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies |
title_fullStr |
Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies |
title_sort |
is it real? science diplomacy in the arctic states’ strategies |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247422000183 |
genre |
Polar Record |
genre_facet |
Polar Record |
op_source |
Polar Record volume 58 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 |
op_rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183 |
container_title |
Polar Record |
container_volume |
58 |
_version_ |
1810472947767312384 |