Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies

Abstract Dominant geopolitical narratives on the Arctic argue that the region is either edging towards conflict or international law is respected and peace is maintained through cooperation to address shared concerns. While both of these narratives are present in the Arctic states’ strategies, most...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Authors: Everett, Karen, Halašková, Barbora
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247422000183
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247422000183
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247422000183 2024-09-15T18:31:19+00:00 Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies Everett, Karen Halašková, Barbora 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247422000183 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Polar Record volume 58 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 journal-article 2022 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183 2024-07-31T04:04:47Z Abstract Dominant geopolitical narratives on the Arctic argue that the region is either edging towards conflict or international law is respected and peace is maintained through cooperation to address shared concerns. While both of these narratives are present in the Arctic states’ strategies, most of them tend to support collaborative efforts. Science diplomacy (SD) is a useful mechanism in this regard as it helps states overcome potential disagreements and can stimulate cooperation in other areas. Given the growing concerns about global risks, SD is more important now than ever before. In our study, we identify and focus on three indicators for potential SD in the Arctic strategies: i) scientific infrastructure; ii) membership in intergovernmental/interparliamentary and scientific/education organisations and networks and iii) specific areas of scientific cooperation. Considering the intensive scientific activity in the region, it is not surprising that the strategies discuss different forms of research and scientific cooperation, although none explicitly use the term “science diplomacy”. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals the Arctic states do apply the SD concept in their strategies and use three types of diplomacy – science in diplomacy , science for diplomacy or diplomacy for science – in the three indicators. Article in Journal/Newspaper Polar Record Cambridge University Press Polar Record 58
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Dominant geopolitical narratives on the Arctic argue that the region is either edging towards conflict or international law is respected and peace is maintained through cooperation to address shared concerns. While both of these narratives are present in the Arctic states’ strategies, most of them tend to support collaborative efforts. Science diplomacy (SD) is a useful mechanism in this regard as it helps states overcome potential disagreements and can stimulate cooperation in other areas. Given the growing concerns about global risks, SD is more important now than ever before. In our study, we identify and focus on three indicators for potential SD in the Arctic strategies: i) scientific infrastructure; ii) membership in intergovernmental/interparliamentary and scientific/education organisations and networks and iii) specific areas of scientific cooperation. Considering the intensive scientific activity in the region, it is not surprising that the strategies discuss different forms of research and scientific cooperation, although none explicitly use the term “science diplomacy”. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals the Arctic states do apply the SD concept in their strategies and use three types of diplomacy – science in diplomacy , science for diplomacy or diplomacy for science – in the three indicators.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Everett, Karen
Halašková, Barbora
spellingShingle Everett, Karen
Halašková, Barbora
Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
author_facet Everett, Karen
Halašková, Barbora
author_sort Everett, Karen
title Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_short Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_full Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_fullStr Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_full_unstemmed Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_sort is it real? science diplomacy in the arctic states’ strategies
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247422000183
genre Polar Record
genre_facet Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 58
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000183
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 58
_version_ 1810472947767312384