Barentsburg and Longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: Residents’ perceptions of community viability

Abstract Geopolitical interventions since the end of the 1980s—such as the collapse of the Soviet Union, a decline in the activities of state-owned coal companies, and governmental initiatives to increase tourism activities—have affected the community viability of two main settlements on Svalbard: B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Authors: Olsen, Julia, Vlakhov, Andrian, Wigger, Karin A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000043
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247422000043
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247422000043
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247422000043 2024-10-06T13:47:35+00:00 Barentsburg and Longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: Residents’ perceptions of community viability Olsen, Julia Vlakhov, Andrian Wigger, Karin A. 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000043 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247422000043 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Polar Record volume 58 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 journal-article 2022 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000043 2024-09-25T04:01:59Z Abstract Geopolitical interventions since the end of the 1980s—such as the collapse of the Soviet Union, a decline in the activities of state-owned coal companies, and governmental initiatives to increase tourism activities—have affected the community viability of two main settlements on Svalbard: Barentsburg and Longyearbyen. This paper explores how the residents of these settlements (with different cultural backgrounds) perceive the effects of socioeconomic transitions on community viability. The analysis of qualitative interviews with residents of Barentsburg ( n = 62) and Longyearbyen ( n = 36) reveals the residents’ perceptions of the pace of the transition and the changing community composition. New types of commercial activities, such as tourism, contribute to local value creation and socioeconomic development but come with concerns grounded in community fluctuation, environmental protection, economic prioritisation, and power relationships. Compared to Longyearbyen, Barentsburg has undergone relatively minor demographic and social changes and remains stable in terms of culture, language, and management practices. We conclude that the viability of Longyearbyen and Barentsburg during the transition was affected by community dynamics and fluctuations, social relationships within and between communities, and local institutional practices. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barentsburg Longyearbyen Polar Record Svalbard Cambridge University Press Svalbard Longyearbyen Barentsburg ENVELOPE(14.212,14.212,78.064,78.064) Polar Record 58
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Geopolitical interventions since the end of the 1980s—such as the collapse of the Soviet Union, a decline in the activities of state-owned coal companies, and governmental initiatives to increase tourism activities—have affected the community viability of two main settlements on Svalbard: Barentsburg and Longyearbyen. This paper explores how the residents of these settlements (with different cultural backgrounds) perceive the effects of socioeconomic transitions on community viability. The analysis of qualitative interviews with residents of Barentsburg ( n = 62) and Longyearbyen ( n = 36) reveals the residents’ perceptions of the pace of the transition and the changing community composition. New types of commercial activities, such as tourism, contribute to local value creation and socioeconomic development but come with concerns grounded in community fluctuation, environmental protection, economic prioritisation, and power relationships. Compared to Longyearbyen, Barentsburg has undergone relatively minor demographic and social changes and remains stable in terms of culture, language, and management practices. We conclude that the viability of Longyearbyen and Barentsburg during the transition was affected by community dynamics and fluctuations, social relationships within and between communities, and local institutional practices.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Olsen, Julia
Vlakhov, Andrian
Wigger, Karin A.
spellingShingle Olsen, Julia
Vlakhov, Andrian
Wigger, Karin A.
Barentsburg and Longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: Residents’ perceptions of community viability
author_facet Olsen, Julia
Vlakhov, Andrian
Wigger, Karin A.
author_sort Olsen, Julia
title Barentsburg and Longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: Residents’ perceptions of community viability
title_short Barentsburg and Longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: Residents’ perceptions of community viability
title_full Barentsburg and Longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: Residents’ perceptions of community viability
title_fullStr Barentsburg and Longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: Residents’ perceptions of community viability
title_full_unstemmed Barentsburg and Longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: Residents’ perceptions of community viability
title_sort barentsburg and longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: residents’ perceptions of community viability
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000043
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247422000043
long_lat ENVELOPE(14.212,14.212,78.064,78.064)
geographic Svalbard
Longyearbyen
Barentsburg
geographic_facet Svalbard
Longyearbyen
Barentsburg
genre Barentsburg
Longyearbyen
Polar Record
Svalbard
genre_facet Barentsburg
Longyearbyen
Polar Record
Svalbard
op_source Polar Record
volume 58
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247422000043
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 58
_version_ 1812175782798163968