The evolution of New Zealand's Antarctic research programme since 1957

ABSTRACT New Zealand's Antarctic research began during the 1957/1958 International Geophysical Year. This analysis explains how and why it has evolved. There have been two phases: 1957 until 1991, when the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research and the universities were the key resear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Author: Morten, Peter
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247417000286
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247417000286
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247417000286
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247417000286 2024-09-15T17:46:13+00:00 The evolution of New Zealand's Antarctic research programme since 1957 Morten, Peter 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247417000286 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247417000286 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 53, issue 4, page 382-395 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 journal-article 2017 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247417000286 2024-07-24T04:03:45Z ABSTRACT New Zealand's Antarctic research began during the 1957/1958 International Geophysical Year. This analysis explains how and why it has evolved. There have been two phases: 1957 until 1991, when the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research and the universities were the key research organisations, and after 1991, when the publicly funded research sector became more diverse. International collaborations have been important throughout. Funding decision processes have progressed from a bottom-up curiosity-driven approach to a more complex system of regular contests. Since 1991, the focus has been on coherent strategies and the outcomes sought. Funding criteria are well-defined and contests are widely accepted as fair and transparent. Reviews and evaluations have been positive. Collaborative organisational interactions dominated decision-making during the early period. Bureaucratic politics is most evident in post-1991 organisational changes. The quality of the research strategies has improved in terms of defining outcomes sought and appropriate measures of progress towards them. However, New Zealand's Antarctic research funding is currently dispersed. It needs better coordination. Collaborative research should be emphasised in areas where New Zealand has established a strong reputation taking account of both national and global priorities if New Zealand's international research standing is to be maintained and enhanced. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Polar Record Cambridge University Press Polar Record 53 4 382 395
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description ABSTRACT New Zealand's Antarctic research began during the 1957/1958 International Geophysical Year. This analysis explains how and why it has evolved. There have been two phases: 1957 until 1991, when the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research and the universities were the key research organisations, and after 1991, when the publicly funded research sector became more diverse. International collaborations have been important throughout. Funding decision processes have progressed from a bottom-up curiosity-driven approach to a more complex system of regular contests. Since 1991, the focus has been on coherent strategies and the outcomes sought. Funding criteria are well-defined and contests are widely accepted as fair and transparent. Reviews and evaluations have been positive. Collaborative organisational interactions dominated decision-making during the early period. Bureaucratic politics is most evident in post-1991 organisational changes. The quality of the research strategies has improved in terms of defining outcomes sought and appropriate measures of progress towards them. However, New Zealand's Antarctic research funding is currently dispersed. It needs better coordination. Collaborative research should be emphasised in areas where New Zealand has established a strong reputation taking account of both national and global priorities if New Zealand's international research standing is to be maintained and enhanced.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Morten, Peter
spellingShingle Morten, Peter
The evolution of New Zealand's Antarctic research programme since 1957
author_facet Morten, Peter
author_sort Morten, Peter
title The evolution of New Zealand's Antarctic research programme since 1957
title_short The evolution of New Zealand's Antarctic research programme since 1957
title_full The evolution of New Zealand's Antarctic research programme since 1957
title_fullStr The evolution of New Zealand's Antarctic research programme since 1957
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of New Zealand's Antarctic research programme since 1957
title_sort evolution of new zealand's antarctic research programme since 1957
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247417000286
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247417000286
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Polar Record
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 53, issue 4, page 382-395
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247417000286
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 53
container_issue 4
container_start_page 382
op_container_end_page 395
_version_ 1810494204881666048