Procedural reform at the Arctic Council: the amended 2015 Observer Manual

ABSTRACT This note studies the addendum to the Arctic Council (AC)'s 2013 Observer Manual adopted at the Senior Arctic Officials’ (SAO) meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, in October 2015. The amendment means another essential step to systematise further and improve the council's working relatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Author: Knecht, Sebastian
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247416000206
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247416000206
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247416000206
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247416000206 2024-03-03T08:40:21+00:00 Procedural reform at the Arctic Council: the amended 2015 Observer Manual Knecht, Sebastian 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247416000206 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247416000206 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 52, issue 5, page 601-605 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 General Earth and Planetary Sciences Ecology Geography, Planning and Development journal-article 2016 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247416000206 2024-02-08T08:45:38Z ABSTRACT This note studies the addendum to the Arctic Council (AC)'s 2013 Observer Manual adopted at the Senior Arctic Officials’ (SAO) meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, in October 2015. The amendment means another essential step to systematise further and improve the council's working relations with currently 32 entities that hold observer status in the forum. Compared to the initial manual that sketched out the role observers should play in the council's subsidiary bodies, the latest revisions delineate a framework for enhancing observer participation and commitment in working group, task force and expert group meetings. After reviewing the content and practical implications of the addendum in the context of larger reform efforts to adapt the council to the age of a global(ising) Arctic, the article further discusses a number of signals the Anchorage decision sends to observers. These comprise the council's willingness and ability to quick, unified and purposeful action towards institutional adaptation and procedural reform as considered necessary to address organisational deficiencies, strengthened top-down steering of the reform processes by SAOs as related to the work conducted in subsidiary bodies and the overall functioning of the council, and higher expectations on observers to contribute to the AC system and deliver on the new provisions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Council Arctic Polar Record Alaska Cambridge University Press Arctic Anchorage Polar Record 52 5 601 605
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Knecht, Sebastian
Procedural reform at the Arctic Council: the amended 2015 Observer Manual
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
description ABSTRACT This note studies the addendum to the Arctic Council (AC)'s 2013 Observer Manual adopted at the Senior Arctic Officials’ (SAO) meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, in October 2015. The amendment means another essential step to systematise further and improve the council's working relations with currently 32 entities that hold observer status in the forum. Compared to the initial manual that sketched out the role observers should play in the council's subsidiary bodies, the latest revisions delineate a framework for enhancing observer participation and commitment in working group, task force and expert group meetings. After reviewing the content and practical implications of the addendum in the context of larger reform efforts to adapt the council to the age of a global(ising) Arctic, the article further discusses a number of signals the Anchorage decision sends to observers. These comprise the council's willingness and ability to quick, unified and purposeful action towards institutional adaptation and procedural reform as considered necessary to address organisational deficiencies, strengthened top-down steering of the reform processes by SAOs as related to the work conducted in subsidiary bodies and the overall functioning of the council, and higher expectations on observers to contribute to the AC system and deliver on the new provisions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Knecht, Sebastian
author_facet Knecht, Sebastian
author_sort Knecht, Sebastian
title Procedural reform at the Arctic Council: the amended 2015 Observer Manual
title_short Procedural reform at the Arctic Council: the amended 2015 Observer Manual
title_full Procedural reform at the Arctic Council: the amended 2015 Observer Manual
title_fullStr Procedural reform at the Arctic Council: the amended 2015 Observer Manual
title_full_unstemmed Procedural reform at the Arctic Council: the amended 2015 Observer Manual
title_sort procedural reform at the arctic council: the amended 2015 observer manual
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247416000206
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247416000206
geographic Arctic
Anchorage
geographic_facet Arctic
Anchorage
genre Arctic Council
Arctic
Polar Record
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic Council
Arctic
Polar Record
Alaska
op_source Polar Record
volume 52, issue 5, page 601-605
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247416000206
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 52
container_issue 5
container_start_page 601
op_container_end_page 605
_version_ 1792496062601101312