Of whales and oil: Inuit resource governance and the Arctic Council

ABSTRACT This article takes a normative approach to explore what and how we might learn from existing indigenous governance arrangements in the Arctic and how they may contribute to the larger debates over Arctic governance and who decides. It begins with a brief exploration of the existing literatu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Author: Shadian, Jessica M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247412000484
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247412000484
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247412000484
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247412000484 2024-03-03T08:40:21+00:00 Of whales and oil: Inuit resource governance and the Arctic Council Shadian, Jessica M. 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247412000484 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247412000484 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 49, issue 4, page 392-405 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 General Earth and Planetary Sciences Ecology Geography, Planning and Development journal-article 2013 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247412000484 2024-02-08T08:33:20Z ABSTRACT This article takes a normative approach to explore what and how we might learn from existing indigenous governance arrangements in the Arctic and how they may contribute to the larger debates over Arctic governance and who decides. It begins with a brief exploration of the existing literature regarding co-management; particularly what some legal scholars have defined as post-Westphalian resource management as well as engaging ongoing discussions about co-management as it pertains to the Arctic. It then turns to the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC) as a case study and possible starting point for governing newly emerging resource management issues in the Arctic. Specifically, this article will look at how the governance framework of the AEWC might be applicable for the current governance discussions regarding Arctic offshore oil and gas development. Lastly, this paper will offer preliminary reflections as to how a post-sovereign resource management approach could contribute to the broader theoretical debates concerning who owns the Arctic and who decides. Specifically it offers one possible way to envisage the future of a strengthened Arctic Council operating in a world where states are not the only actors participating in the governance of the Arctic. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Council Arctic eskimo* inuit Polar Record Alaska Cambridge University Press Arctic Polar Record 49 4 392 405
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Shadian, Jessica M.
Of whales and oil: Inuit resource governance and the Arctic Council
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
description ABSTRACT This article takes a normative approach to explore what and how we might learn from existing indigenous governance arrangements in the Arctic and how they may contribute to the larger debates over Arctic governance and who decides. It begins with a brief exploration of the existing literature regarding co-management; particularly what some legal scholars have defined as post-Westphalian resource management as well as engaging ongoing discussions about co-management as it pertains to the Arctic. It then turns to the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC) as a case study and possible starting point for governing newly emerging resource management issues in the Arctic. Specifically, this article will look at how the governance framework of the AEWC might be applicable for the current governance discussions regarding Arctic offshore oil and gas development. Lastly, this paper will offer preliminary reflections as to how a post-sovereign resource management approach could contribute to the broader theoretical debates concerning who owns the Arctic and who decides. Specifically it offers one possible way to envisage the future of a strengthened Arctic Council operating in a world where states are not the only actors participating in the governance of the Arctic.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Shadian, Jessica M.
author_facet Shadian, Jessica M.
author_sort Shadian, Jessica M.
title Of whales and oil: Inuit resource governance and the Arctic Council
title_short Of whales and oil: Inuit resource governance and the Arctic Council
title_full Of whales and oil: Inuit resource governance and the Arctic Council
title_fullStr Of whales and oil: Inuit resource governance and the Arctic Council
title_full_unstemmed Of whales and oil: Inuit resource governance and the Arctic Council
title_sort of whales and oil: inuit resource governance and the arctic council
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247412000484
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247412000484
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic Council
Arctic
eskimo*
inuit
Polar Record
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic Council
Arctic
eskimo*
inuit
Polar Record
Alaska
op_source Polar Record
volume 49, issue 4, page 392-405
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247412000484
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 49
container_issue 4
container_start_page 392
op_container_end_page 405
_version_ 1792496062801379328