Sovereignty and the Antarctic Treaty

Sovereignty was and still remains one of the principal reasons for human endeavour in Antarctica. The ‘Heroic Era’ of Antarctic exploration was designed principally to seek out not only new lands including the South Pole, but also to assert territorial claims on behalf of the sovereign who sponsored...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Author: Rothwell, Donald R.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s003224740999026x
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S003224740999026X
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s003224740999026x
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s003224740999026x 2024-06-23T07:46:43+00:00 Sovereignty and the Antarctic Treaty Rothwell, Donald R. 2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s003224740999026x https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S003224740999026X en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 46, issue 1, page 17-20 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 journal-article 2009 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s003224740999026x 2024-06-12T04:04:44Z Sovereignty was and still remains one of the principal reasons for human endeavour in Antarctica. The ‘Heroic Era’ of Antarctic exploration was designed principally to seek out not only new lands including the South Pole, but also to assert territorial claims on behalf of the sovereign who sponsored these expeditions. The ‘planting of the flag’ was therefore just as much a crucial component of Antarctic discovery, as also was the conduct of science. Sovereignty and science remained twin pillars of Antarctic endeavour throughout the early part of the twentieth century, and whilst the region escaped the horrors of World War II, it did not take long after the war for Antarctic endeavours to resume on both fronts. In a decade of frantic diplomatic activity during the 1950s, which was highlighted by the 1957–1958 International Geophysical Year and the 1959 Washington Conference, there was also the prospect in 1956 of a case before the International Court of Justice between Argentina, Chile and the United Kingdom over the contested status of territorial claims on the Antarctic Peninsula. Notwithstanding that by this time all of the current claims to the continent had by then been asserted, there had also been moves made by India in 1956 and then again in 1958 to reconsider the management of the continent with a view to its internationalisation under a framework created by the United Nations General Assembly. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica Polar Record South pole South pole Cambridge University Press Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Argentina Endeavour ENVELOPE(162.000,162.000,-76.550,-76.550) South Pole The Antarctic Polar Record 46 1 17 20
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Sovereignty was and still remains one of the principal reasons for human endeavour in Antarctica. The ‘Heroic Era’ of Antarctic exploration was designed principally to seek out not only new lands including the South Pole, but also to assert territorial claims on behalf of the sovereign who sponsored these expeditions. The ‘planting of the flag’ was therefore just as much a crucial component of Antarctic discovery, as also was the conduct of science. Sovereignty and science remained twin pillars of Antarctic endeavour throughout the early part of the twentieth century, and whilst the region escaped the horrors of World War II, it did not take long after the war for Antarctic endeavours to resume on both fronts. In a decade of frantic diplomatic activity during the 1950s, which was highlighted by the 1957–1958 International Geophysical Year and the 1959 Washington Conference, there was also the prospect in 1956 of a case before the International Court of Justice between Argentina, Chile and the United Kingdom over the contested status of territorial claims on the Antarctic Peninsula. Notwithstanding that by this time all of the current claims to the continent had by then been asserted, there had also been moves made by India in 1956 and then again in 1958 to reconsider the management of the continent with a view to its internationalisation under a framework created by the United Nations General Assembly.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rothwell, Donald R.
spellingShingle Rothwell, Donald R.
Sovereignty and the Antarctic Treaty
author_facet Rothwell, Donald R.
author_sort Rothwell, Donald R.
title Sovereignty and the Antarctic Treaty
title_short Sovereignty and the Antarctic Treaty
title_full Sovereignty and the Antarctic Treaty
title_fullStr Sovereignty and the Antarctic Treaty
title_full_unstemmed Sovereignty and the Antarctic Treaty
title_sort sovereignty and the antarctic treaty
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2009
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s003224740999026x
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S003224740999026X
long_lat ENVELOPE(162.000,162.000,-76.550,-76.550)
geographic Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Argentina
Endeavour
South Pole
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Argentina
Endeavour
South Pole
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
Polar Record
South pole
South pole
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
Polar Record
South pole
South pole
op_source Polar Record
volume 46, issue 1, page 17-20
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s003224740999026x
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
op_container_end_page 20
_version_ 1802647740133408768