The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north

ABSTRACT This article examines how US policy makers relate to the European Arctic as an oil and gas region, and more specifically to Norway's efforts to promote the region through its high north policy. The ‘high north’ is defined as the Norwegian and Russian sectors of the Barents Sea. The Nor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Author: Offerdal, Kristine
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247408007754
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247408007754
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247408007754
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247408007754 2024-03-03T08:41:48+00:00 The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north Offerdal, Kristine 2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247408007754 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247408007754 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 45, issue 1, page 59-71 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 General Earth and Planetary Sciences Ecology Geography, Planning and Development journal-article 2009 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247408007754 2024-02-08T08:27:24Z ABSTRACT This article examines how US policy makers relate to the European Arctic as an oil and gas region, and more specifically to Norway's efforts to promote the region through its high north policy. The ‘high north’ is defined as the Norwegian and Russian sectors of the Barents Sea. The Norwegian assumption that northern oil and gas is of interest to the international community is tested by analysing and explaining the character of the US approach, with an assessment of whether Norway has succeeded in influencing how the USA views the high north as an energy region. Norway has managed to raise the awareness of the high north as an energy region in Washington, but the interest in the topic has been moderate. Moreover, Norwegian policy makers in the first phase of the high north initiative have misinterpreted US officials' definition of the situation in which Washington's foreign energy policy is developed. Ironically, Norway's ‘exemplary’ energy policy has led to less response than was initially expected, whereas Russia seems to be of significantly greater interest for the USA. With its relatively small resource potential, straightforward investment climate and unclear high north strategy, Norway and its high north do not stand out as very interesting to the USA, which tends to direct more attention to cases in which its oil and gas companies work under more uncertain investment framework conditions in regions with huge energy resources. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Barents Sea Polar Record Cambridge University Press Arctic Barents Sea Norway Polar Record 45 1 59 71
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Offerdal, Kristine
The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
description ABSTRACT This article examines how US policy makers relate to the European Arctic as an oil and gas region, and more specifically to Norway's efforts to promote the region through its high north policy. The ‘high north’ is defined as the Norwegian and Russian sectors of the Barents Sea. The Norwegian assumption that northern oil and gas is of interest to the international community is tested by analysing and explaining the character of the US approach, with an assessment of whether Norway has succeeded in influencing how the USA views the high north as an energy region. Norway has managed to raise the awareness of the high north as an energy region in Washington, but the interest in the topic has been moderate. Moreover, Norwegian policy makers in the first phase of the high north initiative have misinterpreted US officials' definition of the situation in which Washington's foreign energy policy is developed. Ironically, Norway's ‘exemplary’ energy policy has led to less response than was initially expected, whereas Russia seems to be of significantly greater interest for the USA. With its relatively small resource potential, straightforward investment climate and unclear high north strategy, Norway and its high north do not stand out as very interesting to the USA, which tends to direct more attention to cases in which its oil and gas companies work under more uncertain investment framework conditions in regions with huge energy resources.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Offerdal, Kristine
author_facet Offerdal, Kristine
author_sort Offerdal, Kristine
title The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_short The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_full The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_fullStr The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_full_unstemmed The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_sort european arctic in us foreign energy policy: the case of the norwegian high north
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2009
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247408007754
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247408007754
geographic Arctic
Barents Sea
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Barents Sea
Norway
genre Arctic
Barents Sea
Polar Record
genre_facet Arctic
Barents Sea
Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 45, issue 1, page 59-71
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247408007754
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 45
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
op_container_end_page 71
_version_ 1792497397682667520