Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum

The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (PFII) was established on 31 July 2000 and held its first session at UN Headquarters in New York in May 2002. The result of decades of development, the forum signified an official opening of the UN to indigenous peoples' participation alongside that o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Author: Lindroth, Marjo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247406005493
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247406005493
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247406005493
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247406005493 2024-09-15T18:31:19+00:00 Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum Lindroth, Marjo 2006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247406005493 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247406005493 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 42, issue 3, page 239-248 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 journal-article 2006 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247406005493 2024-09-04T04:04:49Z The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (PFII) was established on 31 July 2000 and held its first session at UN Headquarters in New York in May 2002. The result of decades of development, the forum signified an official opening of the UN to indigenous peoples' participation alongside that of states. This article analyses the discussions on the establishment of the PFII and the role of indigenous peoples as political actors in those discussions. A focus of particular interest is the contradiction between state sovereignty and indigenous self-determination. In examining the establishment process, the analysis draws on scholarship dealing with norms, institutions, organisation and legitimacy. The themes and frames used by indigenous peoples that are significant in state-indigenous relations and that have had an effect on the forum are indigenousness, self-determination, rights and recognition. These show how the relationship between state sovereignty and indigenous self-determination underlay the establishment discussions and their outcome. The materials for the article comprise the transcripts of the establishment negotiations, interventions of state and indigenous representatives, as well as literature on the political participation of indigenous peoples, international law and the UN system and indigenous peoples. The discussions are analysed textually. The article claims that, although the UN is a state-dominated organisation, indigenous peoples are nevertheless able to affect international cooperation. This is an INDIPO project paper (Tennberg 2006). Article in Journal/Newspaper Polar Record Cambridge University Press Polar Record 42 3 239 248
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (PFII) was established on 31 July 2000 and held its first session at UN Headquarters in New York in May 2002. The result of decades of development, the forum signified an official opening of the UN to indigenous peoples' participation alongside that of states. This article analyses the discussions on the establishment of the PFII and the role of indigenous peoples as political actors in those discussions. A focus of particular interest is the contradiction between state sovereignty and indigenous self-determination. In examining the establishment process, the analysis draws on scholarship dealing with norms, institutions, organisation and legitimacy. The themes and frames used by indigenous peoples that are significant in state-indigenous relations and that have had an effect on the forum are indigenousness, self-determination, rights and recognition. These show how the relationship between state sovereignty and indigenous self-determination underlay the establishment discussions and their outcome. The materials for the article comprise the transcripts of the establishment negotiations, interventions of state and indigenous representatives, as well as literature on the political participation of indigenous peoples, international law and the UN system and indigenous peoples. The discussions are analysed textually. The article claims that, although the UN is a state-dominated organisation, indigenous peoples are nevertheless able to affect international cooperation. This is an INDIPO project paper (Tennberg 2006).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lindroth, Marjo
spellingShingle Lindroth, Marjo
Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum
author_facet Lindroth, Marjo
author_sort Lindroth, Marjo
title Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum
title_short Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum
title_full Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum
title_fullStr Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum
title_sort indigenous-state relations in the un: establishing the indigenous forum
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2006
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247406005493
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247406005493
genre Polar Record
genre_facet Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 42, issue 3, page 239-248
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247406005493
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 42
container_issue 3
container_start_page 239
op_container_end_page 248
_version_ 1810472954718322688