Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica under the Protocol on Environmental Protection

ABSTRACT The background to the development and implementation of environmental impact assessment procedures in Antarctica is reviewed and the principles and procedures of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (the Madrid Protocol of 1991) are outlined. The difficulties in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Author: Lyons, David
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1993
Subjects:
Eia
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400023561
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247400023561
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247400023561
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247400023561 2024-03-03T08:38:06+00:00 Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica under the Protocol on Environmental Protection Lyons, David 1993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400023561 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247400023561 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 29, issue 169, page 111-120 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 General Earth and Planetary Sciences Ecology Geography, Planning and Development journal-article 1993 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400023561 2024-02-08T08:37:42Z ABSTRACT The background to the development and implementation of environmental impact assessment procedures in Antarctica is reviewed and the principles and procedures of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (the Madrid Protocol of 1991) are outlined. The difficulties in determining the appropriate level of assessment and the practical, operational aspects of carrying out the evaluations are examined. Particular attention is given to the meaning of terminology in the Protocol, the interpretation of environmental principles and standards, alternatives to the proposed activity, the requirements for sufficient information, the process of obtaining and taking into account public comment, the monitoring of environmental indicators, and the practical implications where an activity needs to be suspended, cancelled, or modified. The workloads generated by the procedures and the credibility of the processes are discussed in view of a possible perception that the exercises may amount to little more than ‘red tape’ to justify decisions that would be taken in any case. Recommendations are made that could improve the EIA process in Antarctica. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Record Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Eia ENVELOPE(7.755,7.755,63.024,63.024) Polar Record 29 169 111 120
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Lyons, David
Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica under the Protocol on Environmental Protection
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
description ABSTRACT The background to the development and implementation of environmental impact assessment procedures in Antarctica is reviewed and the principles and procedures of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (the Madrid Protocol of 1991) are outlined. The difficulties in determining the appropriate level of assessment and the practical, operational aspects of carrying out the evaluations are examined. Particular attention is given to the meaning of terminology in the Protocol, the interpretation of environmental principles and standards, alternatives to the proposed activity, the requirements for sufficient information, the process of obtaining and taking into account public comment, the monitoring of environmental indicators, and the practical implications where an activity needs to be suspended, cancelled, or modified. The workloads generated by the procedures and the credibility of the processes are discussed in view of a possible perception that the exercises may amount to little more than ‘red tape’ to justify decisions that would be taken in any case. Recommendations are made that could improve the EIA process in Antarctica.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lyons, David
author_facet Lyons, David
author_sort Lyons, David
title Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica under the Protocol on Environmental Protection
title_short Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica under the Protocol on Environmental Protection
title_full Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica under the Protocol on Environmental Protection
title_fullStr Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica under the Protocol on Environmental Protection
title_full_unstemmed Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica under the Protocol on Environmental Protection
title_sort environmental impact assessment in antarctica under the protocol on environmental protection
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1993
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400023561
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247400023561
long_lat ENVELOPE(7.755,7.755,63.024,63.024)
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Eia
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Eia
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Polar Record
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 29, issue 169, page 111-120
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400023561
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 29
container_issue 169
container_start_page 111
op_container_end_page 120
_version_ 1792504545394294784