Acquisition of consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty

Abstract Under the regime established by the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, decision-making remains exclusively with the limited number of states that are entitled to appoint representatives to participate in Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings. Whereas the 12 original signatory states have a permanen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Author: Pannatier, Serge
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400021331
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247400021331
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247400021331
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247400021331 2024-03-03T08:37:59+00:00 Acquisition of consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty Pannatier, Serge 1994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400021331 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247400021331 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 30, issue 173, page 123-129 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 General Earth and Planetary Sciences Ecology Geography, Planning and Development journal-article 1994 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400021331 2024-02-08T08:38:21Z Abstract Under the regime established by the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, decision-making remains exclusively with the limited number of states that are entitled to appoint representatives to participate in Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings. Whereas the 12 original signatory states have a permanent right to attend these meetings, acceding states may gain consultative status only during the time they carry out substantial scientific research in the Antarctic. This paper addresses three issues: the first relates to the problems arising out of the ‘admission procedure’ adopted by the original signatory states when faced with the first application of an acceding state to become an Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party, a procedure that has been applied ever since to similar cases. The second looks at the forms of scientific research activities an acceding party ought to conduct in Antarctica in order to meet the requirements laid down in the Antarctic Treaty. The third deals more generally with the issue of limited participation in the Antarctic Treaty decision-making process, which has come under severe criticism from non-Consultative Parties and states that have not acceded to the Treaty. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Record Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Polar Record 30 173 123 129
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Pannatier, Serge
Acquisition of consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
description Abstract Under the regime established by the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, decision-making remains exclusively with the limited number of states that are entitled to appoint representatives to participate in Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings. Whereas the 12 original signatory states have a permanent right to attend these meetings, acceding states may gain consultative status only during the time they carry out substantial scientific research in the Antarctic. This paper addresses three issues: the first relates to the problems arising out of the ‘admission procedure’ adopted by the original signatory states when faced with the first application of an acceding state to become an Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party, a procedure that has been applied ever since to similar cases. The second looks at the forms of scientific research activities an acceding party ought to conduct in Antarctica in order to meet the requirements laid down in the Antarctic Treaty. The third deals more generally with the issue of limited participation in the Antarctic Treaty decision-making process, which has come under severe criticism from non-Consultative Parties and states that have not acceded to the Treaty.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pannatier, Serge
author_facet Pannatier, Serge
author_sort Pannatier, Serge
title Acquisition of consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty
title_short Acquisition of consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty
title_full Acquisition of consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty
title_fullStr Acquisition of consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty
title_full_unstemmed Acquisition of consultative status under the Antarctic Treaty
title_sort acquisition of consultative status under the antarctic treaty
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1994
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400021331
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247400021331
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Polar Record
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 30, issue 173, page 123-129
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400021331
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 30
container_issue 173
container_start_page 123
op_container_end_page 129
_version_ 1792503422893686784