Shipping nuclear cargo via the Northern Sea Route

Abstract The commercial nuclear industry is considering the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative transit route for shipments of radioactive material between Europe and Japan, and as an import$sol;export route for shipments into and out of Russia. Technologically, the NSR is a practicable route...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Authors: Sawhill, Steven G., Ragner, Claes Lykke
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400017289
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247400017289
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247400017289
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247400017289 2024-03-03T08:42:06+00:00 Shipping nuclear cargo via the Northern Sea Route Sawhill, Steven G. Ragner, Claes Lykke 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400017289 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247400017289 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 38, issue 204, page 39-52 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 General Earth and Planetary Sciences Ecology Geography, Planning and Development journal-article 2002 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400017289 2024-02-08T08:40:42Z Abstract The commercial nuclear industry is considering the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative transit route for shipments of radioactive material between Europe and Japan, and as an import$sol;export route for shipments into and out of Russia. Technologically, the NSR is a practicable route, and factors that currently make it uneconomical for most commercial cargoes do not generally apply to nuclear ones. A shorter route between Europe and Japan may reduce operating costs and could enhance the safety and security of nuclearmaterial. Shippers are also attracted by the prospect of reducing political opposition along current routes. These advantages are offset by the cost of building specialised ships, uncertainties associated with Russia and its icebreaker fleet, and uncertainties regarding the risk and effects of a severe transport accident involving radioactive material. The likelihood of using the NSR for nuclear transport remains uncertain. Transit use is unlikely without a basis for long-term transport between Europe and east Asia. Russia's plans to expand its nuclear services industry are not dependent on using the NSR: the Arctic alternative via the port of Dudinka is only one of several suggested routes. Whether it is selected will depend upon whom Russia gains as customers and whether it provides the most convenient, cost-efficient option. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Northern Sea Route Polar Record Cambridge University Press Arctic Dudinka ENVELOPE(86.183,86.183,69.394,69.394) Polar Record 38 204 39 52
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Sawhill, Steven G.
Ragner, Claes Lykke
Shipping nuclear cargo via the Northern Sea Route
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
description Abstract The commercial nuclear industry is considering the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative transit route for shipments of radioactive material between Europe and Japan, and as an import$sol;export route for shipments into and out of Russia. Technologically, the NSR is a practicable route, and factors that currently make it uneconomical for most commercial cargoes do not generally apply to nuclear ones. A shorter route between Europe and Japan may reduce operating costs and could enhance the safety and security of nuclearmaterial. Shippers are also attracted by the prospect of reducing political opposition along current routes. These advantages are offset by the cost of building specialised ships, uncertainties associated with Russia and its icebreaker fleet, and uncertainties regarding the risk and effects of a severe transport accident involving radioactive material. The likelihood of using the NSR for nuclear transport remains uncertain. Transit use is unlikely without a basis for long-term transport between Europe and east Asia. Russia's plans to expand its nuclear services industry are not dependent on using the NSR: the Arctic alternative via the port of Dudinka is only one of several suggested routes. Whether it is selected will depend upon whom Russia gains as customers and whether it provides the most convenient, cost-efficient option.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sawhill, Steven G.
Ragner, Claes Lykke
author_facet Sawhill, Steven G.
Ragner, Claes Lykke
author_sort Sawhill, Steven G.
title Shipping nuclear cargo via the Northern Sea Route
title_short Shipping nuclear cargo via the Northern Sea Route
title_full Shipping nuclear cargo via the Northern Sea Route
title_fullStr Shipping nuclear cargo via the Northern Sea Route
title_full_unstemmed Shipping nuclear cargo via the Northern Sea Route
title_sort shipping nuclear cargo via the northern sea route
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400017289
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247400017289
long_lat ENVELOPE(86.183,86.183,69.394,69.394)
geographic Arctic
Dudinka
geographic_facet Arctic
Dudinka
genre Arctic
Northern Sea Route
Polar Record
genre_facet Arctic
Northern Sea Route
Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 38, issue 204, page 39-52
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400017289
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 38
container_issue 204
container_start_page 39
op_container_end_page 52
_version_ 1792497603361898496