Merging remotely sensed data with geophysical models

Abstract Geophysical models are usually derived from the idealistic viewpoint that all required external parameters are, in principle, measurable. The models are then driven with the best available data for those parameters. In some cases, there are few measurements available, because of factors suc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Authors: Searcy, Craig, Dean, Ken, Stringer, William
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s003224740001384x
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S003224740001384X
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s003224740001384x
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s003224740001384x 2024-03-03T08:42:16+00:00 Merging remotely sensed data with geophysical models Searcy, Craig Dean, Ken Stringer, William 1995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s003224740001384x https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S003224740001384X en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Polar Record volume 31, issue 178, page 297-304 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 General Earth and Planetary Sciences Ecology Geography, Planning and Development journal-article 1995 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s003224740001384x 2024-02-08T08:37:16Z Abstract Geophysical models are usually derived from the idealistic viewpoint that all required external parameters are, in principle, measurable. The models are then driven with the best available data for those parameters. In some cases, there are few measurements available, because of factors such as the location of the phenomena modeled. Satellite imagery provides a synoptic overview of a particular environment, supplying spatial and temporal variability as well as spectral data, making this an ideal source of data for some models. In other cases, although frequent satellite-image observations are available, they are of little use to the modeler, because they do not provide values for the parameters demanded by the model. This paper contains two examples of geophysical models that were derived expressly to utilize measurements and qualitative observations taken from satellite images as the major driving elements of the model. The methodology consists of designing a model such that it can be ‘run’ by numerical data extracted from image data sets, and using the image data for verification of the model or adjustment of parameters. The first example is a thermody namic model of springtime removal of nearshore ice from an Arctic river delta area, using the Mackenzie River as a study site. In this example, a multi-date sequence of AVHRR images is used to provide the spatial and temporal patterns of melt, allowing the required physical observations in the model to be parameterized and tested. The second example is a dynamic model simulating thq evolution of a volcanic ash cloud under the influence of atmospheric winds. In this case, AVHRR images are used to determine the position and size of the ash cloud as a function of time, allowing tuning of parameters and verification of the model. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Mackenzie river Polar Record Cambridge University Press Arctic Mackenzie River Polar Record 31 178 297 304
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Searcy, Craig
Dean, Ken
Stringer, William
Merging remotely sensed data with geophysical models
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
description Abstract Geophysical models are usually derived from the idealistic viewpoint that all required external parameters are, in principle, measurable. The models are then driven with the best available data for those parameters. In some cases, there are few measurements available, because of factors such as the location of the phenomena modeled. Satellite imagery provides a synoptic overview of a particular environment, supplying spatial and temporal variability as well as spectral data, making this an ideal source of data for some models. In other cases, although frequent satellite-image observations are available, they are of little use to the modeler, because they do not provide values for the parameters demanded by the model. This paper contains two examples of geophysical models that were derived expressly to utilize measurements and qualitative observations taken from satellite images as the major driving elements of the model. The methodology consists of designing a model such that it can be ‘run’ by numerical data extracted from image data sets, and using the image data for verification of the model or adjustment of parameters. The first example is a thermody namic model of springtime removal of nearshore ice from an Arctic river delta area, using the Mackenzie River as a study site. In this example, a multi-date sequence of AVHRR images is used to provide the spatial and temporal patterns of melt, allowing the required physical observations in the model to be parameterized and tested. The second example is a dynamic model simulating thq evolution of a volcanic ash cloud under the influence of atmospheric winds. In this case, AVHRR images are used to determine the position and size of the ash cloud as a function of time, allowing tuning of parameters and verification of the model.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Searcy, Craig
Dean, Ken
Stringer, William
author_facet Searcy, Craig
Dean, Ken
Stringer, William
author_sort Searcy, Craig
title Merging remotely sensed data with geophysical models
title_short Merging remotely sensed data with geophysical models
title_full Merging remotely sensed data with geophysical models
title_fullStr Merging remotely sensed data with geophysical models
title_full_unstemmed Merging remotely sensed data with geophysical models
title_sort merging remotely sensed data with geophysical models
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1995
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s003224740001384x
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S003224740001384X
geographic Arctic
Mackenzie River
geographic_facet Arctic
Mackenzie River
genre Arctic
Mackenzie river
Polar Record
genre_facet Arctic
Mackenzie river
Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 31, issue 178, page 297-304
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s003224740001384x
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 31
container_issue 178
container_start_page 297
op_container_end_page 304
_version_ 1792497697754710016