A comparison of the structure of the scolex of Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller 1776) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud. 1819) and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host

1. Two Pseudophyllidea, Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud.), have been obtained from Scophthalmus maximus (L.) and Merluccius merluccius (L.) respectively, from fishing grounds to the west of the British Isles. 2. The musculature of the scolex in both has been compa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Parasitology
Main Author: Rees, Gwendolen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1958
Subjects:
Rud
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000021429
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0031182000021429
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0031182000021429
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0031182000021429 2024-06-16T07:43:03+00:00 A comparison of the structure of the scolex of Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller 1776) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud. 1819) and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host Rees, Gwendolen 1958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000021429 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0031182000021429 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Parasitology volume 48, issue 3-4, page 468-492 ISSN 0031-1820 1469-8161 journal-article 1958 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000021429 2024-05-22T12:56:32Z 1. Two Pseudophyllidea, Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud.), have been obtained from Scophthalmus maximus (L.) and Merluccius merluccius (L.) respectively, from fishing grounds to the west of the British Isles. 2. The musculature of the scolex in both has been compared relative to the form and mode of function of that organ. All the major groups of muscles are present in both, but their arrangement is modified in C. crassiceps , due to the presence of hemispherical bothria, instead of open grooves, and a sphincter muscle around the bothrial opening. 3. The mode of attachment is discussed briefly in C. crassiceps , and in more detail in B. scorpii , where the structure of the scolex was found to be admirably suited to the form of the host's mucosa. The effect on the mucosa is slight, due to the absence of very powerful muscles and of other specialized adhesive structures. 4. The nervous system of the scolex in both species has been compared, and a fundamental similarity has been found. Modifications in C. crassiceps are associated with shortening of the scolex and the difference in form of the bothria. 5. The excretory system shows the same correlation with the form of the scolex. Article in Journal/Newspaper Scophthalmus maximus Cambridge University Press Rud ENVELOPE(17.845,17.845,69.040,69.040) Parasitology 48 3-4 468 492
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description 1. Two Pseudophyllidea, Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud.), have been obtained from Scophthalmus maximus (L.) and Merluccius merluccius (L.) respectively, from fishing grounds to the west of the British Isles. 2. The musculature of the scolex in both has been compared relative to the form and mode of function of that organ. All the major groups of muscles are present in both, but their arrangement is modified in C. crassiceps , due to the presence of hemispherical bothria, instead of open grooves, and a sphincter muscle around the bothrial opening. 3. The mode of attachment is discussed briefly in C. crassiceps , and in more detail in B. scorpii , where the structure of the scolex was found to be admirably suited to the form of the host's mucosa. The effect on the mucosa is slight, due to the absence of very powerful muscles and of other specialized adhesive structures. 4. The nervous system of the scolex in both species has been compared, and a fundamental similarity has been found. Modifications in C. crassiceps are associated with shortening of the scolex and the difference in form of the bothria. 5. The excretory system shows the same correlation with the form of the scolex.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rees, Gwendolen
spellingShingle Rees, Gwendolen
A comparison of the structure of the scolex of Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller 1776) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud. 1819) and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host
author_facet Rees, Gwendolen
author_sort Rees, Gwendolen
title A comparison of the structure of the scolex of Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller 1776) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud. 1819) and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host
title_short A comparison of the structure of the scolex of Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller 1776) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud. 1819) and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host
title_full A comparison of the structure of the scolex of Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller 1776) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud. 1819) and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host
title_fullStr A comparison of the structure of the scolex of Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller 1776) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud. 1819) and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the structure of the scolex of Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller 1776) and Clestobothrium crassiceps (Rud. 1819) and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host
title_sort comparison of the structure of the scolex of bothriocephalus scorpii (müller 1776) and clestobothrium crassiceps (rud. 1819) and the mode of attachment of the scolex to the intestine of the host
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1958
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000021429
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0031182000021429
long_lat ENVELOPE(17.845,17.845,69.040,69.040)
geographic Rud
geographic_facet Rud
genre Scophthalmus maximus
genre_facet Scophthalmus maximus
op_source Parasitology
volume 48, issue 3-4, page 468-492
ISSN 0031-1820 1469-8161
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000021429
container_title Parasitology
container_volume 48
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 468
op_container_end_page 492
_version_ 1802010795267063808