Causality and Cope's Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera

A literature-based compilation of phylogenetic relationships and biometric measurements of 342 Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal species suggests that the group shows a net increase in size through the Cenozoic, thus appearing to follow Cope's Rule of phyletic size increase. However, when the d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Paleontology
Main Authors: Arnold, Anthony J., Kelly, D. C., Parker, W. C.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000034557
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022336000034557
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022336000034557
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022336000034557 2024-09-09T20:04:01+00:00 Causality and Cope's Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera Arnold, Anthony J. Kelly, D. C. Parker, W. C. 1995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000034557 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022336000034557 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Journal of Paleontology volume 69, issue 2, page 203-210 ISSN 0022-3360 1937-2337 journal-article 1995 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000034557 2024-06-19T04:04:00Z A literature-based compilation of phylogenetic relationships and biometric measurements of 342 Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal species suggests that the group shows a net increase in size through the Cenozoic, thus appearing to follow Cope's Rule of phyletic size increase. However, when the data are corrected for size-related biases, they do not support the hypothesis that this apparent trend is driven by an organismal adaptive advantage of larger size. When the planktonic foraminifera return to their “primitive” globigerine morphology during the Eocene-Oligocene transition, there is no indication of size-dependent origination or extinction; however, when the extinction signal is decomposed into pseudoextinctions and true lineage terminations, a differential pulse of pseudoextinction is observed among the smaller forms. This observation suggests that smaller bodied species, rather than surviving stressful times with static morphologies, may evolve their way through times of crisis and go on to found lineages which, by virtue of their initial small size, are stochastically likely to increase in mean size during subsequent diversification. Thus, one general explanation for Cope's Rule might be that smaller bodied species are more adaptively responsive due to their tendency to have shorter generation times. During times of stress, this adaptive responsiveness may give them an advantage that is correlated with, but causally unrelated to, their size. Article in Journal/Newspaper Planktonic foraminifera Cambridge University Press Journal of Paleontology 69 2 203 210
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description A literature-based compilation of phylogenetic relationships and biometric measurements of 342 Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal species suggests that the group shows a net increase in size through the Cenozoic, thus appearing to follow Cope's Rule of phyletic size increase. However, when the data are corrected for size-related biases, they do not support the hypothesis that this apparent trend is driven by an organismal adaptive advantage of larger size. When the planktonic foraminifera return to their “primitive” globigerine morphology during the Eocene-Oligocene transition, there is no indication of size-dependent origination or extinction; however, when the extinction signal is decomposed into pseudoextinctions and true lineage terminations, a differential pulse of pseudoextinction is observed among the smaller forms. This observation suggests that smaller bodied species, rather than surviving stressful times with static morphologies, may evolve their way through times of crisis and go on to found lineages which, by virtue of their initial small size, are stochastically likely to increase in mean size during subsequent diversification. Thus, one general explanation for Cope's Rule might be that smaller bodied species are more adaptively responsive due to their tendency to have shorter generation times. During times of stress, this adaptive responsiveness may give them an advantage that is correlated with, but causally unrelated to, their size.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Arnold, Anthony J.
Kelly, D. C.
Parker, W. C.
spellingShingle Arnold, Anthony J.
Kelly, D. C.
Parker, W. C.
Causality and Cope's Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera
author_facet Arnold, Anthony J.
Kelly, D. C.
Parker, W. C.
author_sort Arnold, Anthony J.
title Causality and Cope's Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera
title_short Causality and Cope's Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera
title_full Causality and Cope's Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera
title_fullStr Causality and Cope's Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera
title_full_unstemmed Causality and Cope's Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera
title_sort causality and cope's rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1995
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000034557
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022336000034557
genre Planktonic foraminifera
genre_facet Planktonic foraminifera
op_source Journal of Paleontology
volume 69, issue 2, page 203-210
ISSN 0022-3360 1937-2337
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000034557
container_title Journal of Paleontology
container_volume 69
container_issue 2
container_start_page 203
op_container_end_page 210
_version_ 1809936039455752192