Internal Reflections in Polar Ice Sheets

Internal reflections are due to changes in electrical admittance between adjacent depositional layers. Reflection coefficients are given for discontinuous changes in either the permittivity or loss tangent. The observed strengths of internal echoes rule out the possibility that they are caused by is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Paren, J. G., Robin, G. de. Q.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1975
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000021730
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000021730
Description
Summary:Internal reflections are due to changes in electrical admittance between adjacent depositional layers. Reflection coefficients are given for discontinuous changes in either the permittivity or loss tangent. The observed strengths of internal echoes rule out the possibility that they are caused by isolated layers containing “foreign” material, but suggest instead that they are due to systematic fluctuations of density, anisotropy, or loss tangent. The electrical behaviour of ice from polar ice sheets is reviewed and compared with that of ice grown in controlled laboratory conditions. We suggest that the impurity distribution in polycrystalline ice is dependent on the impurity content and the temperature of freezing, and the conductivity is essentially determined by the intrinsic and impurity defects within the crystal lattice. In a polar ice sheet, density fluctuations decrease with depth, whereas loss tangents (and hence their fluctuations) increase since the ice becomes warmer towards bedrock. Echo strengths in central Antarctica are compared with those calculated for a boundary where either all bubbles disappear or the loss tangent changes by 50%. Assuming a constant layering geometry to 2 700 m depth, density fluctuations account for echoes above 1 500 m, but deeper echoes are best explained by variations in the ice conductivity.