Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A
Abstract Wide-angle seismic reflections from a glacier bed are sensitive to the presence of subglacial water and to the mechanical strength of the basal zone. The phase of a compressional to shear (P-SV) converted wave is particularly sensitive to the shear coupling between the glacier and its bed....
Published in: | Journal of Glaciology |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
1988
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000009138 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022143000009138 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022143000009138 2024-03-03T08:44:34+00:00 Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A Richards, Mark A. 1988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000009138 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) Journal of Glaciology volume 34, issue 116, page 111-120 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 Earth-Surface Processes journal-article 1988 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138 2024-02-08T08:40:23Z Abstract Wide-angle seismic reflections from a glacier bed are sensitive to the presence of subglacial water and to the mechanical strength of the basal zone. The phase of a compressional to shear (P-SV) converted wave is particularly sensitive to the shear coupling between the glacier and its bed. Both shear (SV) and compressional (P) reflections from the bottom of Variegated Glacier were obtained before the 1982–83 surge event using explosive sources, and the phases of these reflections (relative to the source) were positive as expected for an ice/bedrock interface. During surge, P-wave reflections from the deepest part of the glacier bed were phase reversed, while somewhat shallower P-wave reflections were not. SV reflections were not clearly observed during surge and cannot be interpreted with confidence, even though the experiments were designed to detect them using three-component geophones. The unexpected P-wave phase reversal might be explained by a thin, mechanically weak or fluidized basal debris layer during surge which acts as a strong seismic absorber and suppresses multiple reflections within the layer. However, the required amount of seismic attentuation in the layer seems unreasonably large. An alternative explanation requiring ∼4–8 m or more of water or water-saturated debris (without strong attenuation) is implausible. Article in Journal/Newspaper glacier Journal of Glaciology Alaska Cambridge University Press Journal of Glaciology 34 116 111 120 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
topic |
Earth-Surface Processes |
spellingShingle |
Earth-Surface Processes Richards, Mark A. Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A |
topic_facet |
Earth-Surface Processes |
description |
Abstract Wide-angle seismic reflections from a glacier bed are sensitive to the presence of subglacial water and to the mechanical strength of the basal zone. The phase of a compressional to shear (P-SV) converted wave is particularly sensitive to the shear coupling between the glacier and its bed. Both shear (SV) and compressional (P) reflections from the bottom of Variegated Glacier were obtained before the 1982–83 surge event using explosive sources, and the phases of these reflections (relative to the source) were positive as expected for an ice/bedrock interface. During surge, P-wave reflections from the deepest part of the glacier bed were phase reversed, while somewhat shallower P-wave reflections were not. SV reflections were not clearly observed during surge and cannot be interpreted with confidence, even though the experiments were designed to detect them using three-component geophones. The unexpected P-wave phase reversal might be explained by a thin, mechanically weak or fluidized basal debris layer during surge which acts as a strong seismic absorber and suppresses multiple reflections within the layer. However, the required amount of seismic attentuation in the layer seems unreasonably large. An alternative explanation requiring ∼4–8 m or more of water or water-saturated debris (without strong attenuation) is implausible. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Richards, Mark A. |
author_facet |
Richards, Mark A. |
author_sort |
Richards, Mark A. |
title |
Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A |
title_short |
Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A |
title_full |
Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A |
title_fullStr |
Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A |
title_sort |
seismic evidence for a weak basal layer during the 1982 surge of variegated glacier, alaska, u.s.a |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
1988 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000009138 |
genre |
glacier Journal of Glaciology Alaska |
genre_facet |
glacier Journal of Glaciology Alaska |
op_source |
Journal of Glaciology volume 34, issue 116, page 111-120 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138 |
container_title |
Journal of Glaciology |
container_volume |
34 |
container_issue |
116 |
container_start_page |
111 |
op_container_end_page |
120 |
_version_ |
1792500063567609856 |