Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A

Abstract Wide-angle seismic reflections from a glacier bed are sensitive to the presence of subglacial water and to the mechanical strength of the basal zone. The phase of a compressional to shear (P-SV) converted wave is particularly sensitive to the shear coupling between the glacier and its bed....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Author: Richards, Mark A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000009138
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022143000009138
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022143000009138 2024-03-03T08:44:34+00:00 Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A Richards, Mark A. 1988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000009138 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) Journal of Glaciology volume 34, issue 116, page 111-120 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 Earth-Surface Processes journal-article 1988 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138 2024-02-08T08:40:23Z Abstract Wide-angle seismic reflections from a glacier bed are sensitive to the presence of subglacial water and to the mechanical strength of the basal zone. The phase of a compressional to shear (P-SV) converted wave is particularly sensitive to the shear coupling between the glacier and its bed. Both shear (SV) and compressional (P) reflections from the bottom of Variegated Glacier were obtained before the 1982–83 surge event using explosive sources, and the phases of these reflections (relative to the source) were positive as expected for an ice/bedrock interface. During surge, P-wave reflections from the deepest part of the glacier bed were phase reversed, while somewhat shallower P-wave reflections were not. SV reflections were not clearly observed during surge and cannot be interpreted with confidence, even though the experiments were designed to detect them using three-component geophones. The unexpected P-wave phase reversal might be explained by a thin, mechanically weak or fluidized basal debris layer during surge which acts as a strong seismic absorber and suppresses multiple reflections within the layer. However, the required amount of seismic attentuation in the layer seems unreasonably large. An alternative explanation requiring ∼4–8 m or more of water or water-saturated debris (without strong attenuation) is implausible. Article in Journal/Newspaper glacier Journal of Glaciology Alaska Cambridge University Press Journal of Glaciology 34 116 111 120
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Earth-Surface Processes
spellingShingle Earth-Surface Processes
Richards, Mark A.
Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A
topic_facet Earth-Surface Processes
description Abstract Wide-angle seismic reflections from a glacier bed are sensitive to the presence of subglacial water and to the mechanical strength of the basal zone. The phase of a compressional to shear (P-SV) converted wave is particularly sensitive to the shear coupling between the glacier and its bed. Both shear (SV) and compressional (P) reflections from the bottom of Variegated Glacier were obtained before the 1982–83 surge event using explosive sources, and the phases of these reflections (relative to the source) were positive as expected for an ice/bedrock interface. During surge, P-wave reflections from the deepest part of the glacier bed were phase reversed, while somewhat shallower P-wave reflections were not. SV reflections were not clearly observed during surge and cannot be interpreted with confidence, even though the experiments were designed to detect them using three-component geophones. The unexpected P-wave phase reversal might be explained by a thin, mechanically weak or fluidized basal debris layer during surge which acts as a strong seismic absorber and suppresses multiple reflections within the layer. However, the required amount of seismic attentuation in the layer seems unreasonably large. An alternative explanation requiring ∼4–8 m or more of water or water-saturated debris (without strong attenuation) is implausible.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Richards, Mark A.
author_facet Richards, Mark A.
author_sort Richards, Mark A.
title Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A
title_short Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A
title_full Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A
title_fullStr Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A
title_full_unstemmed Seismic Evidence for a Weak Basal Layer During The 1982 Surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A
title_sort seismic evidence for a weak basal layer during the 1982 surge of variegated glacier, alaska, u.s.a
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1988
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000009138
genre glacier
Journal of Glaciology
Alaska
genre_facet glacier
Journal of Glaciology
Alaska
op_source Journal of Glaciology
volume 34, issue 116, page 111-120
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000009138
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 34
container_issue 116
container_start_page 111
op_container_end_page 120
_version_ 1792500063567609856