On the Mechanics of Surging Glaciers

Abstract Observations of surging glaciers indicate that the flow regime is one dominated by extensional flow. The stress state has substantial longitudinal deviatoric stress. This regime is very different from the conventional model for glacier dynamics which is dominated by shearing flow. In additi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: McMeeking, R. M., Johnson, R. E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1986
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000006948
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000006948
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022143000006948
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022143000006948 2024-09-15T18:15:37+00:00 On the Mechanics of Surging Glaciers McMeeking, R. M. Johnson, R. E. 1986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000006948 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000006948 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) Journal of Glaciology volume 32, issue 110, page 120-132 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 journal-article 1986 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000006948 2024-07-24T04:02:24Z Abstract Observations of surging glaciers indicate that the flow regime is one dominated by extensional flow. The stress state has substantial longitudinal deviatoric stress. This regime is very different from the conventional model for glacier dynamics which is dominated by shearing flow. In addition, the initiation of surging often involves a compression front which travels down the glacier. The compression front seems to divide an up-stream region of high drag at the base of the glacier from one of low drag which allows the rapid sliding. We develop a framework for the mechanics of glaciers undergoing surging. Relevant issues are the extensional and compression flows, high longitudinal deviatoric stress, and the stress state near the basal discontinuity. We find that some of the down-slope component of glacier weight is borne by longitudinal stress in the rapidly sliding region. This stress thrusts against the slowly moving parts of the glacier. We hypothesize that this effect causes the rapidly sliding part to spread and causes the compression front to travel down the glacier. A criterion for spreading of the rapidly sliding part is developed. The mechanics outlined above are used to develop a highly idealized model for glacier surging. We propose that regions of low drag are relatively common features of glaciers. The surge initiates when conditions are met which allow the surge nucleus to spread. The rapidly sliding region of low drag spreads to a large part of the glacier. Surging ends when the low-drag conditions terminate. Because of the changed state of the glacier, surge nuclei are now stable against spreading. Several years of rebuilding must occur before nuclei are once more unstable. Calculations are performed for the evolution of the shape of Medvezhy Glacier during the surge of 1963. We find a remarkable similarity between the data and our computations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Cambridge University Press Journal of Glaciology 32 110 120 132
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Observations of surging glaciers indicate that the flow regime is one dominated by extensional flow. The stress state has substantial longitudinal deviatoric stress. This regime is very different from the conventional model for glacier dynamics which is dominated by shearing flow. In addition, the initiation of surging often involves a compression front which travels down the glacier. The compression front seems to divide an up-stream region of high drag at the base of the glacier from one of low drag which allows the rapid sliding. We develop a framework for the mechanics of glaciers undergoing surging. Relevant issues are the extensional and compression flows, high longitudinal deviatoric stress, and the stress state near the basal discontinuity. We find that some of the down-slope component of glacier weight is borne by longitudinal stress in the rapidly sliding region. This stress thrusts against the slowly moving parts of the glacier. We hypothesize that this effect causes the rapidly sliding part to spread and causes the compression front to travel down the glacier. A criterion for spreading of the rapidly sliding part is developed. The mechanics outlined above are used to develop a highly idealized model for glacier surging. We propose that regions of low drag are relatively common features of glaciers. The surge initiates when conditions are met which allow the surge nucleus to spread. The rapidly sliding region of low drag spreads to a large part of the glacier. Surging ends when the low-drag conditions terminate. Because of the changed state of the glacier, surge nuclei are now stable against spreading. Several years of rebuilding must occur before nuclei are once more unstable. Calculations are performed for the evolution of the shape of Medvezhy Glacier during the surge of 1963. We find a remarkable similarity between the data and our computations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author McMeeking, R. M.
Johnson, R. E.
spellingShingle McMeeking, R. M.
Johnson, R. E.
On the Mechanics of Surging Glaciers
author_facet McMeeking, R. M.
Johnson, R. E.
author_sort McMeeking, R. M.
title On the Mechanics of Surging Glaciers
title_short On the Mechanics of Surging Glaciers
title_full On the Mechanics of Surging Glaciers
title_fullStr On the Mechanics of Surging Glaciers
title_full_unstemmed On the Mechanics of Surging Glaciers
title_sort on the mechanics of surging glaciers
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1986
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000006948
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000006948
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology
volume 32, issue 110, page 120-132
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000006948
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 32
container_issue 110
container_start_page 120
op_container_end_page 132
_version_ 1810453483536515072