Avalanche forecasting — an expert system approach

Abstract Avalanche forecasting for a given region is still a difficult task involving great responsibility. Any tools assisting the expert in the decision-making process are welcome. However, an efficient and successful tool should meet the needs of the forecaster. With this in mind, two models, wer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Schweizer, Jürg, Föhn, Paul M. B.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000004172
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000004172
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022143000004172
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0022143000004172 2024-04-28T08:26:47+00:00 Avalanche forecasting — an expert system approach Schweizer, Jürg Föhn, Paul M. B. 1996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000004172 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000004172 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) Journal of Glaciology volume 42, issue 141, page 318-332 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 Earth-Surface Processes journal-article 1996 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000004172 2024-04-09T06:56:19Z Abstract Avalanche forecasting for a given region is still a difficult task involving great responsibility. Any tools assisting the expert in the decision-making process are welcome. However, an efficient and successful tool should meet the needs of the forecaster. With this in mind, two models, were developed using a commercially available software: CYBERTEK-COGENSYS TM , a judgment processor for inductive decision-making–a principally data-based expert system. Using weather, snow and snow-cover data as input parameters, the models evaluate for a region the degree of avalanche hazard, the aspect and altitude of the most dangerous slopes. The output result is based on the snow-cover stability. The new models were developed and have been tested in the Davos region (Swiss Alps) for several years. To rate the models, their output is compared to the a posteriori verified hazard. the first model is purely data-based. Compared to other statistical models, the differences are: more input information about the snow cover from snow profiles and Rutschblock tests, the specific method to search for similar situations, the concise output result and the knowledge base that includes the verified degree of avalanche hazard. The performance is about 60%. The second, more-refined model, is both data- and rule-based. It tries to model the decision-making process of a pragmatic expert and has a performance of about 70%, which is comparable to the accuracy of the public warning. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Cambridge University Press Journal of Glaciology 42 141 318 332
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Earth-Surface Processes
spellingShingle Earth-Surface Processes
Schweizer, Jürg
Föhn, Paul M. B.
Avalanche forecasting — an expert system approach
topic_facet Earth-Surface Processes
description Abstract Avalanche forecasting for a given region is still a difficult task involving great responsibility. Any tools assisting the expert in the decision-making process are welcome. However, an efficient and successful tool should meet the needs of the forecaster. With this in mind, two models, were developed using a commercially available software: CYBERTEK-COGENSYS TM , a judgment processor for inductive decision-making–a principally data-based expert system. Using weather, snow and snow-cover data as input parameters, the models evaluate for a region the degree of avalanche hazard, the aspect and altitude of the most dangerous slopes. The output result is based on the snow-cover stability. The new models were developed and have been tested in the Davos region (Swiss Alps) for several years. To rate the models, their output is compared to the a posteriori verified hazard. the first model is purely data-based. Compared to other statistical models, the differences are: more input information about the snow cover from snow profiles and Rutschblock tests, the specific method to search for similar situations, the concise output result and the knowledge base that includes the verified degree of avalanche hazard. The performance is about 60%. The second, more-refined model, is both data- and rule-based. It tries to model the decision-making process of a pragmatic expert and has a performance of about 70%, which is comparable to the accuracy of the public warning.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Schweizer, Jürg
Föhn, Paul M. B.
author_facet Schweizer, Jürg
Föhn, Paul M. B.
author_sort Schweizer, Jürg
title Avalanche forecasting — an expert system approach
title_short Avalanche forecasting — an expert system approach
title_full Avalanche forecasting — an expert system approach
title_fullStr Avalanche forecasting — an expert system approach
title_full_unstemmed Avalanche forecasting — an expert system approach
title_sort avalanche forecasting — an expert system approach
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1996
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000004172
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000004172
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology
volume 42, issue 141, page 318-332
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000004172
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 42
container_issue 141
container_start_page 318
op_container_end_page 332
_version_ 1797586032519020544