THE NATURE OF POWER: CAPE ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY, THE HISTORY OF IDEAS AND NEOLIBERAL HISTORIOGRAPHY The Rise of Conservation in South Africa: Settlers, Livestock and the Environment, 1770–1950 . By W<scp>ILLIAM</scp> B<scp>EINART</scp>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Pp. xxiii+402. £65 (ISBN 0-19-926151-2). Social History and African Environments . Edited by W<scp>ILLIAM</scp> B<scp>EINART</scp> and J<scp>O</scp>A<scp>NN</scp> M<scp>C</scp>G<scp>REGOR</scp>. Oxford: James Currey; Athens: Ohio University Press; Cape Town: David Philip, 2003. Pp. xii+275. £45 (ISBN 0-85255-951-8); £18.95, paperback (ISBN 0-85255-950-X). Environment, Power and Injustice: A South African History . By N<scp>ANCY</scp> J. J<scp>ACOBS</scp>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. xxi+300. £45; $65 (ISBN 0-521-81191-0); £16.95; $24, paperback (ISBN 0-521-01070-5).

• Published in: The Journal of African History
• Main Author: VAN SITTERT, LANCE
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2004
• Subjects: History; Endeavour; North Atlantic
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021853704009454; https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0021853704009454

For a region purportedly a backwater of South African environmental history at the close of the twentieth century,1 the Cape has moved rapidly toward centre stage at the start of the new millennium. It now boasts a wealth of literature in international journals and last year saw the publication of the first book-length environmental histories of the region, with the promise of still more to come, not least from a strong crop of recently or nearly completed doctoral dissertations in academies round the north Atlantic rim.2 The Cape owes this distinction to being the oldest region of British missionary and imperial endeavour in the subcontinent, guaranteeing extensive archives in the northern hemisphere and explaining both the bias in the current scholarship towards the pre-1910 period and lack of a comparable scholarship on any other part of southern Africa.3 This anomalous florescence can also be read for likely future trends in a national historiography otherwise unanimously deemed moribund if not actually in decline for the past decade.4 What it reveals are two contending trajectories: the first a shift away from political economy to the history of ideas and the other a fidelity to the late twentieth-century radical social history tradition and its core theme of the social relations of production.