Allied High Commission for Germany
During October and November, 1950, press reports indicated that the Allied High Commission for Germany was primarily concerned with the implementation of the three-power agreement on Germany reached in New York on September 19, 1950. Although all of the proposals relating to the creation of mobile p...
Published in: | International Organization |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
1951
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020818300030034 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0020818300030034 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0020818300030034 2024-03-03T08:47:06+00:00 Allied High Commission for Germany 1951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020818300030034 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms International Organization volume 5, issue 1, page 226-227 ISSN 0020-8183 1531-5088 Law Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science journal-article 1951 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034 2024-02-08T08:39:21Z During October and November, 1950, press reports indicated that the Allied High Commission for Germany was primarily concerned with the implementation of the three-power agreement on Germany reached in New York on September 19, 1950. Although all of the proposals relating to the creation of mobile police formations and the integration of German forces into those of western Europe were stalled pending agreement between the members of the North Atlantic Council as to the nature and size of such German forces, reports indicated that consideration of various proposals to amend the occupation statute were going forward. While no details were revealed, the Chancellor of western Germany (Adenauer) indicated that one suggestion had been that the easing of allied industrial, economic and political controls would be conditioned upon the acceptance by the Bonn government of prewar German debts and a willingness to share strategic war materials. Other reports indicated that the amended occupation statute would terminate controls over German use of funds, food and other supplies, permit the lapsing of powers enforcing decartelization once existing orders had been carried through and adequate legislation enacted, and would abandon the review of all laws or directives while reserving emergency power to annul any believed inconsistent with previous policy. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Cambridge University Press International Organization 5 1 226 227 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
topic |
Law Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science |
spellingShingle |
Law Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science Allied High Commission for Germany |
topic_facet |
Law Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science |
description |
During October and November, 1950, press reports indicated that the Allied High Commission for Germany was primarily concerned with the implementation of the three-power agreement on Germany reached in New York on September 19, 1950. Although all of the proposals relating to the creation of mobile police formations and the integration of German forces into those of western Europe were stalled pending agreement between the members of the North Atlantic Council as to the nature and size of such German forces, reports indicated that consideration of various proposals to amend the occupation statute were going forward. While no details were revealed, the Chancellor of western Germany (Adenauer) indicated that one suggestion had been that the easing of allied industrial, economic and political controls would be conditioned upon the acceptance by the Bonn government of prewar German debts and a willingness to share strategic war materials. Other reports indicated that the amended occupation statute would terminate controls over German use of funds, food and other supplies, permit the lapsing of powers enforcing decartelization once existing orders had been carried through and adequate legislation enacted, and would abandon the review of all laws or directives while reserving emergency power to annul any believed inconsistent with previous policy. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
title |
Allied High Commission for Germany |
title_short |
Allied High Commission for Germany |
title_full |
Allied High Commission for Germany |
title_fullStr |
Allied High Commission for Germany |
title_full_unstemmed |
Allied High Commission for Germany |
title_sort |
allied high commission for germany |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
1951 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020818300030034 |
genre |
North Atlantic |
genre_facet |
North Atlantic |
op_source |
International Organization volume 5, issue 1, page 226-227 ISSN 0020-8183 1531-5088 |
op_rights |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034 |
container_title |
International Organization |
container_volume |
5 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
226 |
op_container_end_page |
227 |
_version_ |
1792503249032445952 |