Allied High Commission for Germany

During October and November, 1950, press reports indicated that the Allied High Commission for Germany was primarily concerned with the implementation of the three-power agreement on Germany reached in New York on September 19, 1950. Although all of the proposals relating to the creation of mobile p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Organization
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1951
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020818300030034
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0020818300030034
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0020818300030034 2024-03-03T08:47:06+00:00 Allied High Commission for Germany 1951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020818300030034 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms International Organization volume 5, issue 1, page 226-227 ISSN 0020-8183 1531-5088 Law Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science journal-article 1951 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034 2024-02-08T08:39:21Z During October and November, 1950, press reports indicated that the Allied High Commission for Germany was primarily concerned with the implementation of the three-power agreement on Germany reached in New York on September 19, 1950. Although all of the proposals relating to the creation of mobile police formations and the integration of German forces into those of western Europe were stalled pending agreement between the members of the North Atlantic Council as to the nature and size of such German forces, reports indicated that consideration of various proposals to amend the occupation statute were going forward. While no details were revealed, the Chancellor of western Germany (Adenauer) indicated that one suggestion had been that the easing of allied industrial, economic and political controls would be conditioned upon the acceptance by the Bonn government of prewar German debts and a willingness to share strategic war materials. Other reports indicated that the amended occupation statute would terminate controls over German use of funds, food and other supplies, permit the lapsing of powers enforcing decartelization once existing orders had been carried through and adequate legislation enacted, and would abandon the review of all laws or directives while reserving emergency power to annul any believed inconsistent with previous policy. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Cambridge University Press International Organization 5 1 226 227
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Law
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
spellingShingle Law
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
Allied High Commission for Germany
topic_facet Law
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
description During October and November, 1950, press reports indicated that the Allied High Commission for Germany was primarily concerned with the implementation of the three-power agreement on Germany reached in New York on September 19, 1950. Although all of the proposals relating to the creation of mobile police formations and the integration of German forces into those of western Europe were stalled pending agreement between the members of the North Atlantic Council as to the nature and size of such German forces, reports indicated that consideration of various proposals to amend the occupation statute were going forward. While no details were revealed, the Chancellor of western Germany (Adenauer) indicated that one suggestion had been that the easing of allied industrial, economic and political controls would be conditioned upon the acceptance by the Bonn government of prewar German debts and a willingness to share strategic war materials. Other reports indicated that the amended occupation statute would terminate controls over German use of funds, food and other supplies, permit the lapsing of powers enforcing decartelization once existing orders had been carried through and adequate legislation enacted, and would abandon the review of all laws or directives while reserving emergency power to annul any believed inconsistent with previous policy.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Allied High Commission for Germany
title_short Allied High Commission for Germany
title_full Allied High Commission for Germany
title_fullStr Allied High Commission for Germany
title_full_unstemmed Allied High Commission for Germany
title_sort allied high commission for germany
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1951
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020818300030034
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source International Organization
volume 5, issue 1, page 226-227
ISSN 0020-8183 1531-5088
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300030034
container_title International Organization
container_volume 5
container_issue 1
container_start_page 226
op_container_end_page 227
_version_ 1792503249032445952