International Whaling Commission

At a whaling conference in London, in June 1959, representatives of the United Kingdom, Japan, the Netherlands, and Norway again failed to reach agreement on a national quota arrangement for whaling in the Antarctic, a problem which they had been discussing intermittently since November 1958. At the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Organization
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1959
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300009541
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020818300009541
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0020818300009541
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0020818300009541 2024-03-03T08:38:22+00:00 International Whaling Commission 1959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300009541 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020818300009541 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms International Organization volume 13, issue 4, page 669-669 ISSN 0020-8183 1531-5088 Law Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science journal-article 1959 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300009541 2024-02-08T08:48:13Z At a whaling conference in London, in June 1959, representatives of the United Kingdom, Japan, the Netherlands, and Norway again failed to reach agreement on a national quota arrangement for whaling in the Antarctic, a problem which they had been discussing intermittently since November 1958. At the end of the futile talks, Norway resigned from the International Whaling Convention. The Netherlands subsequently followed suit, leaving only die United Kingdom, Japan, and the Soviet Union as members. In consequence, no over-all international quota was fixed for die 1959–1960 season, scheduled to open on December 28. However, the International Whaling Commission reportedly agreed at its eleventh annual meeting diet the maximum permissible catch of whales for the Antarctic season 1959–1960 should not be changed, the figure remaining at 15,000 blue whale units. The blue whale stocks in the North Atlantic were considered to be too low for exploitation at present, so this species was scheduled for complete protection. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Blue whale North Atlantic Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Norway International Organization 13 4 669 669
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Law
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
spellingShingle Law
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
International Whaling Commission
topic_facet Law
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
description At a whaling conference in London, in June 1959, representatives of the United Kingdom, Japan, the Netherlands, and Norway again failed to reach agreement on a national quota arrangement for whaling in the Antarctic, a problem which they had been discussing intermittently since November 1958. At the end of the futile talks, Norway resigned from the International Whaling Convention. The Netherlands subsequently followed suit, leaving only die United Kingdom, Japan, and the Soviet Union as members. In consequence, no over-all international quota was fixed for die 1959–1960 season, scheduled to open on December 28. However, the International Whaling Commission reportedly agreed at its eleventh annual meeting diet the maximum permissible catch of whales for the Antarctic season 1959–1960 should not be changed, the figure remaining at 15,000 blue whale units. The blue whale stocks in the North Atlantic were considered to be too low for exploitation at present, so this species was scheduled for complete protection.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title International Whaling Commission
title_short International Whaling Commission
title_full International Whaling Commission
title_fullStr International Whaling Commission
title_full_unstemmed International Whaling Commission
title_sort international whaling commission
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1959
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300009541
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020818300009541
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Norway
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Norway
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Blue whale
North Atlantic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Blue whale
North Atlantic
op_source International Organization
volume 13, issue 4, page 669-669
ISSN 0020-8183 1531-5088
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300009541
container_title International Organization
container_volume 13
container_issue 4
container_start_page 669
op_container_end_page 669
_version_ 1792506755688693760