“Does American Religious History Have a Center?” Reflections

The three essays presented in this session raise issues that remind me of two classic representations of the problem of interpretation. In the Japanese film Rashomon , four differing and incompatible accounts of the same event are presented by the central characters, leaving the viewer to wonder whi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Church History
Main Author: Williams, Peter W.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009640700095767
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0009640700095767
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0009640700095767
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0009640700095767 2024-03-03T08:49:21+00:00 “Does American Religious History Have a Center?” Reflections Williams, Peter W. 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009640700095767 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0009640700095767 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Church History volume 71, issue 2, page 386-390 ISSN 0009-6407 1755-2613 Religious studies History Cultural Studies journal-article 2002 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009640700095767 2024-02-08T08:43:16Z The three essays presented in this session raise issues that remind me of two classic representations of the problem of interpretation. In the Japanese film Rashomon , four differing and incompatible accounts of the same event are presented by the central characters, leaving the viewer to wonder which, if any, is the “true” version. Similarly, in the “Doubloon” chapter of Melville's Moby Dick , Captain Ahab nails a Spanish gold coin to the mast as a potential reward for the first man to spot the white whale; subsequently, each member of the crew gazes at the doubloon and falls into his own unique chain of associations that it evokes. Each of these fictional situations evokes the dilemma of the historian in general and the religious historian in particular: how can I deliver an accurate, persuasive, and satisfying account of my material, given the inevitable differences in perception and value that separate me not only from my professional peers but from the vast numbers of individuals and groups whose account might well be different from mine? As Stephen Stein indicates, the dilemma is not purely “academic,” since our students expect a coherent narrative from us, and will inevitably go away frustrated if we simply give them fragments that seem to form no discernible whole. Article in Journal/Newspaper White whale Cambridge University Press Ahab ENVELOPE(-62.178,-62.178,-65.434,-65.434) Captain Ahab ENVELOPE(-57.617,-57.617,-62.000,-62.000) Church History 71 2 386 390
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Religious studies
History
Cultural Studies
spellingShingle Religious studies
History
Cultural Studies
Williams, Peter W.
“Does American Religious History Have a Center?” Reflections
topic_facet Religious studies
History
Cultural Studies
description The three essays presented in this session raise issues that remind me of two classic representations of the problem of interpretation. In the Japanese film Rashomon , four differing and incompatible accounts of the same event are presented by the central characters, leaving the viewer to wonder which, if any, is the “true” version. Similarly, in the “Doubloon” chapter of Melville's Moby Dick , Captain Ahab nails a Spanish gold coin to the mast as a potential reward for the first man to spot the white whale; subsequently, each member of the crew gazes at the doubloon and falls into his own unique chain of associations that it evokes. Each of these fictional situations evokes the dilemma of the historian in general and the religious historian in particular: how can I deliver an accurate, persuasive, and satisfying account of my material, given the inevitable differences in perception and value that separate me not only from my professional peers but from the vast numbers of individuals and groups whose account might well be different from mine? As Stephen Stein indicates, the dilemma is not purely “academic,” since our students expect a coherent narrative from us, and will inevitably go away frustrated if we simply give them fragments that seem to form no discernible whole.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Williams, Peter W.
author_facet Williams, Peter W.
author_sort Williams, Peter W.
title “Does American Religious History Have a Center?” Reflections
title_short “Does American Religious History Have a Center?” Reflections
title_full “Does American Religious History Have a Center?” Reflections
title_fullStr “Does American Religious History Have a Center?” Reflections
title_full_unstemmed “Does American Religious History Have a Center?” Reflections
title_sort “does american religious history have a center?” reflections
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009640700095767
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0009640700095767
long_lat ENVELOPE(-62.178,-62.178,-65.434,-65.434)
ENVELOPE(-57.617,-57.617,-62.000,-62.000)
geographic Ahab
Captain Ahab
geographic_facet Ahab
Captain Ahab
genre White whale
genre_facet White whale
op_source Church History
volume 71, issue 2, page 386-390
ISSN 0009-6407 1755-2613
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009640700095767
container_title Church History
container_volume 71
container_issue 2
container_start_page 386
op_container_end_page 390
_version_ 1792506571352178688