Caribou crossings: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, conservation, and stakeholdership in the Anthropocene

Abstract This article engages with notions of conservation in the Anthropocene from a history-of-science perspective. It does so by looking at an iconic case of infrastructure development that since the 1970s continues to cause controversies amongst wildlife experts: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The British Journal for the History of Science
Main Author: Schleper, Simone
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007087422000048
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0007087422000048
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0007087422000048
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0007087422000048 2024-09-15T18:01:45+00:00 Caribou crossings: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, conservation, and stakeholdership in the Anthropocene Schleper, Simone 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007087422000048 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0007087422000048 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The British Journal for the History of Science volume 55, issue 2, page 127-143 ISSN 0007-0874 1474-001X journal-article 2022 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087422000048 2024-08-14T04:04:09Z Abstract This article engages with notions of conservation in the Anthropocene from a history-of-science perspective. It does so by looking at an iconic case of infrastructure development that since the 1970s continues to cause controversies amongst wildlife experts: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). I examine how, from the 1970s onwards, the TAPS functioned as an experimental device for ecologists to test the adaptability of migratory caribou to changed environments and their dependency on unaltered ranges. Based on archival research, published reports and interviews, I show that arguments about animal learning, despite assigning a more active role to caribou in the conservation process, did not result in more inclusive forms of development that respected ecological processes and the various stakes of the caribou. In fact, a focus on caribou crossings as an easily observable, yet sole, indicator of the pipeline's impact resulted in a simplified representation of environmental relationships, that was used by the oil industry to argue for additional extraction projects. Arguments based on the material interdependencies of caribou with their environment, though seemingly similar to traditional arguments about range preservation, emerged as part of conservationists’ attempts to account for the ecological stakes of caribou, other animals and people. Article in Journal/Newspaper caribou Alaska Cambridge University Press The British Journal for the History of Science 1 17
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract This article engages with notions of conservation in the Anthropocene from a history-of-science perspective. It does so by looking at an iconic case of infrastructure development that since the 1970s continues to cause controversies amongst wildlife experts: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). I examine how, from the 1970s onwards, the TAPS functioned as an experimental device for ecologists to test the adaptability of migratory caribou to changed environments and their dependency on unaltered ranges. Based on archival research, published reports and interviews, I show that arguments about animal learning, despite assigning a more active role to caribou in the conservation process, did not result in more inclusive forms of development that respected ecological processes and the various stakes of the caribou. In fact, a focus on caribou crossings as an easily observable, yet sole, indicator of the pipeline's impact resulted in a simplified representation of environmental relationships, that was used by the oil industry to argue for additional extraction projects. Arguments based on the material interdependencies of caribou with their environment, though seemingly similar to traditional arguments about range preservation, emerged as part of conservationists’ attempts to account for the ecological stakes of caribou, other animals and people.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Schleper, Simone
spellingShingle Schleper, Simone
Caribou crossings: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, conservation, and stakeholdership in the Anthropocene
author_facet Schleper, Simone
author_sort Schleper, Simone
title Caribou crossings: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, conservation, and stakeholdership in the Anthropocene
title_short Caribou crossings: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, conservation, and stakeholdership in the Anthropocene
title_full Caribou crossings: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, conservation, and stakeholdership in the Anthropocene
title_fullStr Caribou crossings: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, conservation, and stakeholdership in the Anthropocene
title_full_unstemmed Caribou crossings: the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, conservation, and stakeholdership in the Anthropocene
title_sort caribou crossings: the trans-alaska pipeline system, conservation, and stakeholdership in the anthropocene
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007087422000048
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0007087422000048
genre caribou
Alaska
genre_facet caribou
Alaska
op_source The British Journal for the History of Science
volume 55, issue 2, page 127-143
ISSN 0007-0874 1474-001X
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087422000048
container_title The British Journal for the History of Science
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 17
_version_ 1810438828994854912