Mosaic evolution in the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage

Abstract Recent studies have shown that modes of evolution, namely directional trend, random walk, and stasis, vary across morphologic traits and over the geographic range of a taxon. If so, is it possible that our interpretation of evolutionary modes is actually driven by our selection of traits in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paleobiology
Main Authors: Si, Weimin, Berggren, William A., Aubry, Marie-Pierre
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pab.2017.23
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0094837317000239
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/pab.2017.23
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/pab.2017.23 2024-03-03T08:48:01+00:00 Mosaic evolution in the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage Si, Weimin Berggren, William A. Aubry, Marie-Pierre 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pab.2017.23 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0094837317000239 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Paleobiology volume 44, issue 2, page 263-272 ISSN 0094-8373 1938-5331 Paleontology General Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2018 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2017.23 2024-02-08T08:36:58Z Abstract Recent studies have shown that modes of evolution, namely directional trend, random walk, and stasis, vary across morphologic traits and over the geographic range of a taxon. If so, is it possible that our interpretation of evolutionary modes is actually driven by our selection of traits in a study? In an attempt to answer this question, we have restudied the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage, an iconic example of gradual morphologic evolution. In contrast to previous studies that have focused on the gross morphology as embodied by the edge view of tests, we analyze here multiple phenotypic traits chosen because their biologic and ecologic significance is well understood in living populations. We find that traits in the lineage did not evolve in concert. The timing and geographic pattern of changes in shape, coiling direction, size, and ecology were different. The evolution of this lineage is a mosaic combination of different evolutionary modes for different traits. We suggest that overemphasis on the evolution of some single trait, such as the edge-view outline, from narrow geographic ranges has significantly underestimated the dynamic evolutionary history of this group. Article in Journal/Newspaper Planktonic foraminifera Cambridge University Press Paleobiology 44 2 263 272
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Paleontology
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Paleontology
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Si, Weimin
Berggren, William A.
Aubry, Marie-Pierre
Mosaic evolution in the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage
topic_facet Paleontology
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Abstract Recent studies have shown that modes of evolution, namely directional trend, random walk, and stasis, vary across morphologic traits and over the geographic range of a taxon. If so, is it possible that our interpretation of evolutionary modes is actually driven by our selection of traits in a study? In an attempt to answer this question, we have restudied the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage, an iconic example of gradual morphologic evolution. In contrast to previous studies that have focused on the gross morphology as embodied by the edge view of tests, we analyze here multiple phenotypic traits chosen because their biologic and ecologic significance is well understood in living populations. We find that traits in the lineage did not evolve in concert. The timing and geographic pattern of changes in shape, coiling direction, size, and ecology were different. The evolution of this lineage is a mosaic combination of different evolutionary modes for different traits. We suggest that overemphasis on the evolution of some single trait, such as the edge-view outline, from narrow geographic ranges has significantly underestimated the dynamic evolutionary history of this group.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Si, Weimin
Berggren, William A.
Aubry, Marie-Pierre
author_facet Si, Weimin
Berggren, William A.
Aubry, Marie-Pierre
author_sort Si, Weimin
title Mosaic evolution in the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage
title_short Mosaic evolution in the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage
title_full Mosaic evolution in the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage
title_fullStr Mosaic evolution in the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage
title_full_unstemmed Mosaic evolution in the middle Miocene planktonic foraminifera Fohsella lineage
title_sort mosaic evolution in the middle miocene planktonic foraminifera fohsella lineage
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pab.2017.23
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0094837317000239
genre Planktonic foraminifera
genre_facet Planktonic foraminifera
op_source Paleobiology
volume 44, issue 2, page 263-272
ISSN 0094-8373 1938-5331
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2017.23
container_title Paleobiology
container_volume 44
container_issue 2
container_start_page 263
op_container_end_page 272
_version_ 1792504349191045120