Investigating the bias of TanDEM-X digital elevation models of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau: impacting factors and potential effects on geodetic mass-balance measurements

Abstract The TanDEM-X DEM is a valuable data source for estimating glacier mass balance. However, the accuracy of TanDEM-X elevation over glaciers can be affected by microwave penetration and phase decorrelation. To investigate the bias of TanDEM-X DEMs of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau, these DEMs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Li, Jia, Li, Zhi-Wei, Hu, Jun, Wu, Li-Xin, Li, Xin, Guo, Lei, Liu, Zhuo, Miao, Ze-Lang, Wang, Wei, Chen, Jun-Li
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.15
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143021000150
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2021.15
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2021.15 2024-10-06T13:50:16+00:00 Investigating the bias of TanDEM-X digital elevation models of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau: impacting factors and potential effects on geodetic mass-balance measurements Li, Jia Li, Zhi-Wei Hu, Jun Wu, Li-Xin Li, Xin Guo, Lei Liu, Zhuo Miao, Ze-Lang Wang, Wei Chen, Jun-Li 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.15 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143021000150 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Journal of Glaciology page 1-14 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 journal-article 2021 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.15 2024-09-11T04:03:59Z Abstract The TanDEM-X DEM is a valuable data source for estimating glacier mass balance. However, the accuracy of TanDEM-X elevation over glaciers can be affected by microwave penetration and phase decorrelation. To investigate the bias of TanDEM-X DEMs of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau, these DEMs were subtracted from SPOT-6 DEMs obtained around the same time at two study sites. The average bias over the studied glacier areas in West Kunlun (175.0 km 2 ) was 2.106 ± 0.012 m in April 2014, and it was 1.523 ± 0.011 m in Geladandong (228.8 km 2 ) in October 2013. By combining backscatter coefficients and interferometric coherence maps, we found surface decorrelation and baseline decorrelation can cause obvious bias in addition to microwave penetration. If the optical/laser data and winter TanDEM-X data were used as new and historic elevation sources for mass-balance measurements over an arbitrary observation period of 10 years, the glacier mass loss rates in West Kunlun and Geladandong would be potentially underestimated by 0.218 ± 0.016 and 0.158 ± 0.011 m w.e. a −1 , respectively. The impact is therefore significant, and users should carefully treat the bias of TanDEM-X DEMs when retrieving a geodetic glacier mass balance. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Cambridge University Press Geodetic Glacier ENVELOPE(163.800,163.800,-77.750,-77.750) Journal of Glaciology 67 264 613 626
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract The TanDEM-X DEM is a valuable data source for estimating glacier mass balance. However, the accuracy of TanDEM-X elevation over glaciers can be affected by microwave penetration and phase decorrelation. To investigate the bias of TanDEM-X DEMs of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau, these DEMs were subtracted from SPOT-6 DEMs obtained around the same time at two study sites. The average bias over the studied glacier areas in West Kunlun (175.0 km 2 ) was 2.106 ± 0.012 m in April 2014, and it was 1.523 ± 0.011 m in Geladandong (228.8 km 2 ) in October 2013. By combining backscatter coefficients and interferometric coherence maps, we found surface decorrelation and baseline decorrelation can cause obvious bias in addition to microwave penetration. If the optical/laser data and winter TanDEM-X data were used as new and historic elevation sources for mass-balance measurements over an arbitrary observation period of 10 years, the glacier mass loss rates in West Kunlun and Geladandong would be potentially underestimated by 0.218 ± 0.016 and 0.158 ± 0.011 m w.e. a −1 , respectively. The impact is therefore significant, and users should carefully treat the bias of TanDEM-X DEMs when retrieving a geodetic glacier mass balance.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Li, Jia
Li, Zhi-Wei
Hu, Jun
Wu, Li-Xin
Li, Xin
Guo, Lei
Liu, Zhuo
Miao, Ze-Lang
Wang, Wei
Chen, Jun-Li
spellingShingle Li, Jia
Li, Zhi-Wei
Hu, Jun
Wu, Li-Xin
Li, Xin
Guo, Lei
Liu, Zhuo
Miao, Ze-Lang
Wang, Wei
Chen, Jun-Li
Investigating the bias of TanDEM-X digital elevation models of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau: impacting factors and potential effects on geodetic mass-balance measurements
author_facet Li, Jia
Li, Zhi-Wei
Hu, Jun
Wu, Li-Xin
Li, Xin
Guo, Lei
Liu, Zhuo
Miao, Ze-Lang
Wang, Wei
Chen, Jun-Li
author_sort Li, Jia
title Investigating the bias of TanDEM-X digital elevation models of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau: impacting factors and potential effects on geodetic mass-balance measurements
title_short Investigating the bias of TanDEM-X digital elevation models of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau: impacting factors and potential effects on geodetic mass-balance measurements
title_full Investigating the bias of TanDEM-X digital elevation models of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau: impacting factors and potential effects on geodetic mass-balance measurements
title_fullStr Investigating the bias of TanDEM-X digital elevation models of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau: impacting factors and potential effects on geodetic mass-balance measurements
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the bias of TanDEM-X digital elevation models of glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau: impacting factors and potential effects on geodetic mass-balance measurements
title_sort investigating the bias of tandem-x digital elevation models of glaciers on the tibetan plateau: impacting factors and potential effects on geodetic mass-balance measurements
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.15
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143021000150
long_lat ENVELOPE(163.800,163.800,-77.750,-77.750)
geographic Geodetic Glacier
geographic_facet Geodetic Glacier
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology
page 1-14
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.15
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 67
container_issue 264
container_start_page 613
op_container_end_page 626
_version_ 1812178370155249664