The influence of environmental microseismicity on detection and interpretation of small-magnitude events in a polar glacier setting

Abstract Glacial environments exhibit temporally variable microseismicity. To investigate how microseismicity influences event detection, we implement two noise-adaptive digital power detectors to process seismic data from Taylor Glacier, Antarctica. We add scaled icequake waveforms to the original...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Carr, Chris G., Carmichael, Joshua D., Pettit, Erin C., Truffer, Martin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.48
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143020000489
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2020.48
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2020.48 2024-03-03T08:37:54+00:00 The influence of environmental microseismicity on detection and interpretation of small-magnitude events in a polar glacier setting Carr, Chris G. Carmichael, Joshua D. Pettit, Erin C. Truffer, Martin 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.48 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143020000489 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Glaciology volume 66, issue 259, page 790-806 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 Earth-Surface Processes journal-article 2020 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.48 2024-02-08T08:44:47Z Abstract Glacial environments exhibit temporally variable microseismicity. To investigate how microseismicity influences event detection, we implement two noise-adaptive digital power detectors to process seismic data from Taylor Glacier, Antarctica. We add scaled icequake waveforms to the original data stream, run detectors on the hybrid data stream to estimate reliable detection magnitudes and compare analytical magnitudes predicted from an ice crack source model. We find that detection capability is influenced by environmental microseismicity for seismic events with source size comparable to thermal penetration depths. When event counts and minimum detectable event sizes change in the same direction (i.e. increase in event counts and minimum detectable event size), we interpret measured seismicity changes as ‘true’ seismicity changes rather than as changes in detection. Generally, one detector (two degree of freedom (2dof)) outperforms the other: it identifies more events, a more prominent summertime diurnal signal and maintains a higher detection capability. We conclude that real physical processes are responsible for the summertime diurnal inter-detector difference. One detector (3dof) identifies this process as environmental microseismicity; the other detector (2dof) identifies it as elevated waveform activity. Our analysis provides an example for minimizing detection biases and estimating source sizes when interpreting temporal seismicity patterns to better infer glacial seismogenic processes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Journal of Glaciology Taylor Glacier Cambridge University Press Taylor Glacier ENVELOPE(162.167,162.167,-77.733,-77.733) Journal of Glaciology 66 259 790 806
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Earth-Surface Processes
spellingShingle Earth-Surface Processes
Carr, Chris G.
Carmichael, Joshua D.
Pettit, Erin C.
Truffer, Martin
The influence of environmental microseismicity on detection and interpretation of small-magnitude events in a polar glacier setting
topic_facet Earth-Surface Processes
description Abstract Glacial environments exhibit temporally variable microseismicity. To investigate how microseismicity influences event detection, we implement two noise-adaptive digital power detectors to process seismic data from Taylor Glacier, Antarctica. We add scaled icequake waveforms to the original data stream, run detectors on the hybrid data stream to estimate reliable detection magnitudes and compare analytical magnitudes predicted from an ice crack source model. We find that detection capability is influenced by environmental microseismicity for seismic events with source size comparable to thermal penetration depths. When event counts and minimum detectable event sizes change in the same direction (i.e. increase in event counts and minimum detectable event size), we interpret measured seismicity changes as ‘true’ seismicity changes rather than as changes in detection. Generally, one detector (two degree of freedom (2dof)) outperforms the other: it identifies more events, a more prominent summertime diurnal signal and maintains a higher detection capability. We conclude that real physical processes are responsible for the summertime diurnal inter-detector difference. One detector (3dof) identifies this process as environmental microseismicity; the other detector (2dof) identifies it as elevated waveform activity. Our analysis provides an example for minimizing detection biases and estimating source sizes when interpreting temporal seismicity patterns to better infer glacial seismogenic processes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Carr, Chris G.
Carmichael, Joshua D.
Pettit, Erin C.
Truffer, Martin
author_facet Carr, Chris G.
Carmichael, Joshua D.
Pettit, Erin C.
Truffer, Martin
author_sort Carr, Chris G.
title The influence of environmental microseismicity on detection and interpretation of small-magnitude events in a polar glacier setting
title_short The influence of environmental microseismicity on detection and interpretation of small-magnitude events in a polar glacier setting
title_full The influence of environmental microseismicity on detection and interpretation of small-magnitude events in a polar glacier setting
title_fullStr The influence of environmental microseismicity on detection and interpretation of small-magnitude events in a polar glacier setting
title_full_unstemmed The influence of environmental microseismicity on detection and interpretation of small-magnitude events in a polar glacier setting
title_sort influence of environmental microseismicity on detection and interpretation of small-magnitude events in a polar glacier setting
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.48
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143020000489
long_lat ENVELOPE(162.167,162.167,-77.733,-77.733)
geographic Taylor Glacier
geographic_facet Taylor Glacier
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Journal of Glaciology
Taylor Glacier
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Journal of Glaciology
Taylor Glacier
op_source Journal of Glaciology
volume 66, issue 259, page 790-806
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.48
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 66
container_issue 259
container_start_page 790
op_container_end_page 806
_version_ 1792502735070822400