Comparison of turbulent structures and energy fluxes over exposed and debris-covered glacier ice

Abstract We present the first direct comparison of turbulence conditions measured simultaneously over exposed ice and a 0.08 m thick supraglacial debris cover on Suldenferner, a small glacier in the Italian Alps. Surface roughness, sensible heat fluxes (~20–50 W m −2 ), latent heat fluxes (~2–10 W m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Nicholson, Lindsey, Stiperski, Ivana
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.23
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143020000234
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2020.23
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2020.23 2024-06-23T07:54:15+00:00 Comparison of turbulent structures and energy fluxes over exposed and debris-covered glacier ice Nicholson, Lindsey Stiperski, Ivana 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.23 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143020000234 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Glaciology volume 66, issue 258, page 543-555 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 journal-article 2020 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.23 2024-06-05T04:03:41Z Abstract We present the first direct comparison of turbulence conditions measured simultaneously over exposed ice and a 0.08 m thick supraglacial debris cover on Suldenferner, a small glacier in the Italian Alps. Surface roughness, sensible heat fluxes (~20–50 W m −2 ), latent heat fluxes (~2–10 W m −2 ), topology and scale of turbulence are similar over both glacier surface types during katabatic and synoptically disturbed conditions. Exceptions are sunny days when buoyant convection becomes significant over debris-covered ice (sensible heat flux ~ −100 W m −2 latent heat flux ~ −30 W m −2 ) and prevailing katabatic conditions are rapidly broken down even over this thin debris cover. The similarity in turbulent properties implies that both surface types can be treated the same in terms of boundary layer similarity theory. The differences in turbulence between the two surface types on this glacier are dominated by the radiative and thermal contrasts, thus during sunny days debris cover alters both the local surface turbulent energy fluxes and the glacier component of valley circulation. These variations under different flow conditions should be accounted for when distributing temperature fields for modeling applications over partially debris-covered glaciers. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Cambridge University Press Journal of Glaciology 66 258 543 555
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract We present the first direct comparison of turbulence conditions measured simultaneously over exposed ice and a 0.08 m thick supraglacial debris cover on Suldenferner, a small glacier in the Italian Alps. Surface roughness, sensible heat fluxes (~20–50 W m −2 ), latent heat fluxes (~2–10 W m −2 ), topology and scale of turbulence are similar over both glacier surface types during katabatic and synoptically disturbed conditions. Exceptions are sunny days when buoyant convection becomes significant over debris-covered ice (sensible heat flux ~ −100 W m −2 latent heat flux ~ −30 W m −2 ) and prevailing katabatic conditions are rapidly broken down even over this thin debris cover. The similarity in turbulent properties implies that both surface types can be treated the same in terms of boundary layer similarity theory. The differences in turbulence between the two surface types on this glacier are dominated by the radiative and thermal contrasts, thus during sunny days debris cover alters both the local surface turbulent energy fluxes and the glacier component of valley circulation. These variations under different flow conditions should be accounted for when distributing temperature fields for modeling applications over partially debris-covered glaciers.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nicholson, Lindsey
Stiperski, Ivana
spellingShingle Nicholson, Lindsey
Stiperski, Ivana
Comparison of turbulent structures and energy fluxes over exposed and debris-covered glacier ice
author_facet Nicholson, Lindsey
Stiperski, Ivana
author_sort Nicholson, Lindsey
title Comparison of turbulent structures and energy fluxes over exposed and debris-covered glacier ice
title_short Comparison of turbulent structures and energy fluxes over exposed and debris-covered glacier ice
title_full Comparison of turbulent structures and energy fluxes over exposed and debris-covered glacier ice
title_fullStr Comparison of turbulent structures and energy fluxes over exposed and debris-covered glacier ice
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of turbulent structures and energy fluxes over exposed and debris-covered glacier ice
title_sort comparison of turbulent structures and energy fluxes over exposed and debris-covered glacier ice
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.23
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143020000234
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology
volume 66, issue 258, page 543-555
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.23
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 66
container_issue 258
container_start_page 543
op_container_end_page 555
_version_ 1802646358694297600