Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction

ABSTRACT The long-accepted theory to explain why snow is slippery postulates self-lubrication: frictional heat from sliding melts and thereby lubricates the contacting snow grains. We recently published micro-scale interface observations that contradicted this explanation: contacting snow grains abr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: LEVER, JAMES H., TAYLOR, SUSAN, HOCH, GARRETT R., DAGHLIAN, CHARLES
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.97
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143018000977
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2018.97
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2018.97 2024-06-23T07:54:15+00:00 Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction LEVER, JAMES H. TAYLOR, SUSAN HOCH, GARRETT R. DAGHLIAN, CHARLES 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.97 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143018000977 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Glaciology volume 65, issue 249, page 68-84 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 journal-article 2018 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.97 2024-05-29T08:09:07Z ABSTRACT The long-accepted theory to explain why snow is slippery postulates self-lubrication: frictional heat from sliding melts and thereby lubricates the contacting snow grains. We recently published micro-scale interface observations that contradicted this explanation: contacting snow grains abraded and did not melt under a polyethylene slider, despite low friction values. Here we provide additional observational and theoretical evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction. We obtained coordinated infrared, visible-light and scanning-electron micrographs that confirm that the evolving shapes observed during our tribometer tests are contacting snow grains polished by abrasion, and that the wear particles can sinter together and fill the adjacent pore spaces. Furthermore, dry-contact abrasive wear reasonably predicts the evolution of snow-slider contact area, and sliding-heat-source theory confirms that contact temperatures would not reach 0°C during our tribometer tests. Importantly, published measurements of interface temperatures also indicate that melting did not occur during field tests on sleds and skis. Although prevailing theory anticipates a transition from dry to lubricated contact along a slider, we suggest that dry-contact abrasion and heat flow can prevent this transition from occurring for snow-friction scenarios of practical interest. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Cambridge University Press Journal of Glaciology 65 249 68 84
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description ABSTRACT The long-accepted theory to explain why snow is slippery postulates self-lubrication: frictional heat from sliding melts and thereby lubricates the contacting snow grains. We recently published micro-scale interface observations that contradicted this explanation: contacting snow grains abraded and did not melt under a polyethylene slider, despite low friction values. Here we provide additional observational and theoretical evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction. We obtained coordinated infrared, visible-light and scanning-electron micrographs that confirm that the evolving shapes observed during our tribometer tests are contacting snow grains polished by abrasion, and that the wear particles can sinter together and fill the adjacent pore spaces. Furthermore, dry-contact abrasive wear reasonably predicts the evolution of snow-slider contact area, and sliding-heat-source theory confirms that contact temperatures would not reach 0°C during our tribometer tests. Importantly, published measurements of interface temperatures also indicate that melting did not occur during field tests on sleds and skis. Although prevailing theory anticipates a transition from dry to lubricated contact along a slider, we suggest that dry-contact abrasion and heat flow can prevent this transition from occurring for snow-friction scenarios of practical interest.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author LEVER, JAMES H.
TAYLOR, SUSAN
HOCH, GARRETT R.
DAGHLIAN, CHARLES
spellingShingle LEVER, JAMES H.
TAYLOR, SUSAN
HOCH, GARRETT R.
DAGHLIAN, CHARLES
Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
author_facet LEVER, JAMES H.
TAYLOR, SUSAN
HOCH, GARRETT R.
DAGHLIAN, CHARLES
author_sort LEVER, JAMES H.
title Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_short Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_full Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_fullStr Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_full_unstemmed Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
title_sort evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.97
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143018000977
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology
volume 65, issue 249, page 68-84
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.97
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 65
container_issue 249
container_start_page 68
op_container_end_page 84
_version_ 1802646353007869952