An optimized method to calculate the geodetic mass balance of mountain glaciers

ABSTRACT Understanding the effects of climate on glaciers requires precise estimates of ice volume change over several decades. This is achieved by the geodetic mass balance computed by two means: (1) the digital elevation model (DEM) comparison (SeqDEM) allows measurements over the entire glacier,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: BASANTES-SERRANO, RUBÉN, RABATEL, ANTOINE, VINCENT, CHRISTIAN, SIRGUEY, PASCAL
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.79
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143018000795
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2018.79
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2018.79 2024-03-03T08:46:08+00:00 An optimized method to calculate the geodetic mass balance of mountain glaciers BASANTES-SERRANO, RUBÉN RABATEL, ANTOINE VINCENT, CHRISTIAN SIRGUEY, PASCAL 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.79 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143018000795 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Glaciology volume 64, issue 248, page 917-931 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 Earth-Surface Processes journal-article 2018 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.79 2024-02-08T08:39:16Z ABSTRACT Understanding the effects of climate on glaciers requires precise estimates of ice volume change over several decades. This is achieved by the geodetic mass balance computed by two means: (1) the digital elevation model (DEM) comparison (SeqDEM) allows measurements over the entire glacier, however the low contrast over glacierized areas is an issue for the DEM generation through the photogrammetric techniques and (2) the profiling method (SePM) is a faster alternative but fails to capture the spatial variability of elevation changes. We present a new framework (SSD) that relies upon the spatial variability of the elevation change to densify a sampling network to optimize the surface-elevation change quantification. Our method was tested in two small glaciers over different periods. We conclude that the SePM overestimates the elevation change by ~20% with a mean difference of ~1.00 m (root mean square error (RMSE) = ~3.00 m) compared with results from the SeqDEM method. A variogram analysis of the elevation changes showed a mean difference of <0.10 m (RMSE = ~2.40 m) with SSD approach. A final assessment on the largest glacier in the French Alps confirms the high potential of our method to compute the geodetic mass balance, without going through the generation of a full-density DEM, but with a similar accuracy than the SeqDEM approach. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Cambridge University Press Journal of Glaciology 64 248 917 931
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Earth-Surface Processes
spellingShingle Earth-Surface Processes
BASANTES-SERRANO, RUBÉN
RABATEL, ANTOINE
VINCENT, CHRISTIAN
SIRGUEY, PASCAL
An optimized method to calculate the geodetic mass balance of mountain glaciers
topic_facet Earth-Surface Processes
description ABSTRACT Understanding the effects of climate on glaciers requires precise estimates of ice volume change over several decades. This is achieved by the geodetic mass balance computed by two means: (1) the digital elevation model (DEM) comparison (SeqDEM) allows measurements over the entire glacier, however the low contrast over glacierized areas is an issue for the DEM generation through the photogrammetric techniques and (2) the profiling method (SePM) is a faster alternative but fails to capture the spatial variability of elevation changes. We present a new framework (SSD) that relies upon the spatial variability of the elevation change to densify a sampling network to optimize the surface-elevation change quantification. Our method was tested in two small glaciers over different periods. We conclude that the SePM overestimates the elevation change by ~20% with a mean difference of ~1.00 m (root mean square error (RMSE) = ~3.00 m) compared with results from the SeqDEM method. A variogram analysis of the elevation changes showed a mean difference of <0.10 m (RMSE = ~2.40 m) with SSD approach. A final assessment on the largest glacier in the French Alps confirms the high potential of our method to compute the geodetic mass balance, without going through the generation of a full-density DEM, but with a similar accuracy than the SeqDEM approach.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author BASANTES-SERRANO, RUBÉN
RABATEL, ANTOINE
VINCENT, CHRISTIAN
SIRGUEY, PASCAL
author_facet BASANTES-SERRANO, RUBÉN
RABATEL, ANTOINE
VINCENT, CHRISTIAN
SIRGUEY, PASCAL
author_sort BASANTES-SERRANO, RUBÉN
title An optimized method to calculate the geodetic mass balance of mountain glaciers
title_short An optimized method to calculate the geodetic mass balance of mountain glaciers
title_full An optimized method to calculate the geodetic mass balance of mountain glaciers
title_fullStr An optimized method to calculate the geodetic mass balance of mountain glaciers
title_full_unstemmed An optimized method to calculate the geodetic mass balance of mountain glaciers
title_sort optimized method to calculate the geodetic mass balance of mountain glaciers
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.79
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143018000795
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology
volume 64, issue 248, page 917-931
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.79
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 64
container_issue 248
container_start_page 917
op_container_end_page 931
_version_ 1792502086117621760