A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model

ABSTRACT Meltwater is important to understanding glacier health and dynamics. Since melt measurements are uncommon, ice ablation estimates are often based on models including the positive degree day (PDD) model. The PDD estimate is popular since it only requires air temperature as input, but suffers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: TSAI, VICTOR C., RUAN, XIAOZHOU
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143018000552
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2018.55
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2018.55 2024-10-13T14:07:27+00:00 A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model TSAI, VICTOR C. RUAN, XIAOZHOU 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143018000552 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Glaciology volume 64, issue 246, page 661-668 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 journal-article 2018 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55 2024-09-18T04:04:04Z ABSTRACT Meltwater is important to understanding glacier health and dynamics. Since melt measurements are uncommon, ice ablation estimates are often based on models including the positive degree day (PDD) model. The PDD estimate is popular since it only requires air temperature as input, but suffers from the lack of physical motivation of an energy-balance model. We present a physics-based alternative to the PDD model that still only takes air/surface temperature as input. The model resembles the PDD model except accounting for time lags in ablation when cold ice needs to be warmed. The model is expressed as a differential equation with a single extra parameter related to the efficiency of heating a near-surface layer of ice. With zero thickness, the model reduces to the PDD model, providing a physical basis for the PDD model. Applying the model to data from Greenland, it improves modestly upon the PDD model, with the main improvement being better prediction of early season melting. This new model is a useful compromise, with some of the physics of more realistic models and the simplicity of a PDD model. The model should improve estimates of meltwater production and help constrain PDD parameters when empirical calibration is challenging. Article in Journal/Newspaper glacier Greenland Journal of Glaciology Cambridge University Press Greenland Journal of Glaciology 64 246 661 668
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description ABSTRACT Meltwater is important to understanding glacier health and dynamics. Since melt measurements are uncommon, ice ablation estimates are often based on models including the positive degree day (PDD) model. The PDD estimate is popular since it only requires air temperature as input, but suffers from the lack of physical motivation of an energy-balance model. We present a physics-based alternative to the PDD model that still only takes air/surface temperature as input. The model resembles the PDD model except accounting for time lags in ablation when cold ice needs to be warmed. The model is expressed as a differential equation with a single extra parameter related to the efficiency of heating a near-surface layer of ice. With zero thickness, the model reduces to the PDD model, providing a physical basis for the PDD model. Applying the model to data from Greenland, it improves modestly upon the PDD model, with the main improvement being better prediction of early season melting. This new model is a useful compromise, with some of the physics of more realistic models and the simplicity of a PDD model. The model should improve estimates of meltwater production and help constrain PDD parameters when empirical calibration is challenging.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author TSAI, VICTOR C.
RUAN, XIAOZHOU
spellingShingle TSAI, VICTOR C.
RUAN, XIAOZHOU
A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
author_facet TSAI, VICTOR C.
RUAN, XIAOZHOU
author_sort TSAI, VICTOR C.
title A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_short A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_full A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_fullStr A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_full_unstemmed A simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
title_sort simple physics-based improvement to the positive degree day model
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143018000552
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre glacier
Greenland
Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet glacier
Greenland
Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology
volume 64, issue 246, page 661-668
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.55
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 64
container_issue 246
container_start_page 661
op_container_end_page 668
_version_ 1812813741468680192