Viscosity and elasticity: a model intercomparison of ice-shelf bending in an Antarctic grounding zone

ABSTRACT Grounding zones are vital to ice-sheet mass balance and its coupling to the global ocean circulation. Processes here determine the mass discharge from the grounded ice sheet, to the floating ice shelves. The response of this transition zone to tidal forcing has been described by both elasti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: WILD, CHRISTIAN T., MARSH, OLIVER J., RACK, WOLFGANG
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.15
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143017000156
_version_ 1829943348218036224
author WILD, CHRISTIAN T.
MARSH, OLIVER J.
RACK, WOLFGANG
author_facet WILD, CHRISTIAN T.
MARSH, OLIVER J.
RACK, WOLFGANG
author_sort WILD, CHRISTIAN T.
collection Cambridge University Press
container_issue 240
container_start_page 573
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 63
description ABSTRACT Grounding zones are vital to ice-sheet mass balance and its coupling to the global ocean circulation. Processes here determine the mass discharge from the grounded ice sheet, to the floating ice shelves. The response of this transition zone to tidal forcing has been described by both elastic and viscoelastic models. Here we examine the validity of these models for grounding zone flexure over tidal timescales using field data from the Southern McMurdo Ice Shelf (78° 15′S, 167° 7′E). Observations of tidal movement were carried out by simultaneous tiltmeter and GPS measurements along a profile across the grounding zone. Finite-element simulations covering a 64 d period reveal that the viscoelastic model fits best the observations using a Young's modulus of 1.6 GPa and a viscosity of 10 13.7 Pa s (≈ 50.1 TPa s). We conclude that the elastic model is only well-constrained for tidal displacements >35% of the spring-tidal amplitude using a Young's modulus of 1.62 ± 0.69 GPa, but that a viscoelastic model is necessary to adequately capture tidal bending at amplitudes below this threshold. In grounding zones where bending stresses are greater than at the Southern McMurdo Ice Shelf or ice viscosity is lower, the threshold would be even higher.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
Ice Shelves
Journal of Glaciology
McMurdo Ice Shelf
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
Ice Shelves
Journal of Glaciology
McMurdo Ice Shelf
geographic Antarctic
McMurdo Ice Shelf
geographic_facet Antarctic
McMurdo Ice Shelf
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2017.15
institution Open Polar
language English
long_lat ENVELOPE(166.500,166.500,-78.000,-78.000)
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
op_container_end_page 580
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.15
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Journal of Glaciology
volume 63, issue 240, page 573-580
ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652
publishDate 2017
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/jog.2017.15 2025-04-20T14:25:48+00:00 Viscosity and elasticity: a model intercomparison of ice-shelf bending in an Antarctic grounding zone WILD, CHRISTIAN T. MARSH, OLIVER J. RACK, WOLFGANG 2017 https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.15 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143017000156 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Glaciology volume 63, issue 240, page 573-580 ISSN 0022-1430 1727-5652 journal-article 2017 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.15 2025-04-08T10:26:16Z ABSTRACT Grounding zones are vital to ice-sheet mass balance and its coupling to the global ocean circulation. Processes here determine the mass discharge from the grounded ice sheet, to the floating ice shelves. The response of this transition zone to tidal forcing has been described by both elastic and viscoelastic models. Here we examine the validity of these models for grounding zone flexure over tidal timescales using field data from the Southern McMurdo Ice Shelf (78° 15′S, 167° 7′E). Observations of tidal movement were carried out by simultaneous tiltmeter and GPS measurements along a profile across the grounding zone. Finite-element simulations covering a 64 d period reveal that the viscoelastic model fits best the observations using a Young's modulus of 1.6 GPa and a viscosity of 10 13.7 Pa s (≈ 50.1 TPa s). We conclude that the elastic model is only well-constrained for tidal displacements >35% of the spring-tidal amplitude using a Young's modulus of 1.62 ± 0.69 GPa, but that a viscoelastic model is necessary to adequately capture tidal bending at amplitudes below this threshold. In grounding zones where bending stresses are greater than at the Southern McMurdo Ice Shelf or ice viscosity is lower, the threshold would be even higher. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Ice Sheet Ice Shelf Ice Shelves Journal of Glaciology McMurdo Ice Shelf Cambridge University Press Antarctic McMurdo Ice Shelf ENVELOPE(166.500,166.500,-78.000,-78.000) Journal of Glaciology 63 240 573 580
spellingShingle WILD, CHRISTIAN T.
MARSH, OLIVER J.
RACK, WOLFGANG
Viscosity and elasticity: a model intercomparison of ice-shelf bending in an Antarctic grounding zone
title Viscosity and elasticity: a model intercomparison of ice-shelf bending in an Antarctic grounding zone
title_full Viscosity and elasticity: a model intercomparison of ice-shelf bending in an Antarctic grounding zone
title_fullStr Viscosity and elasticity: a model intercomparison of ice-shelf bending in an Antarctic grounding zone
title_full_unstemmed Viscosity and elasticity: a model intercomparison of ice-shelf bending in an Antarctic grounding zone
title_short Viscosity and elasticity: a model intercomparison of ice-shelf bending in an Antarctic grounding zone
title_sort viscosity and elasticity: a model intercomparison of ice-shelf bending in an antarctic grounding zone
url https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2017.15
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143017000156