Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions

Abstract Flowering rush ( Butomus umbellatus L.) is an invasive aquatic and wetland plant capable of developing monotypic stands in emergent and submersed sites. This plant can rapidly outcompete native vegetation and impede human practices by reducing recreation (boating, fishing, and skiing) and d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Invasive Plant Science and Management
Main Authors: Turnage, Gray, Madsen, John D., Wersal, Ryan M., Byrd, John D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1939729119000063
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/inp.2019.6
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/inp.2019.6 2024-09-15T18:00:33+00:00 Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions Turnage, Gray Madsen, John D. Wersal, Ryan M. Byrd, John D. 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1939729119000063 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Invasive Plant Science and Management volume 12, issue 02, page 120-123 ISSN 1939-7291 1939-747X journal-article 2019 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6 2024-06-26T04:03:56Z Abstract Flowering rush ( Butomus umbellatus L.) is an invasive aquatic and wetland plant capable of developing monotypic stands in emergent and submersed sites. This plant can rapidly outcompete native vegetation and impede human practices by reducing recreation (boating, fishing, and skiing) and disrupting agricultural use of water resources (irrigation canals). Mechanical removal practices occurring biweekly, monthly, bimonthly, and once per growing season were compared with chemical control with diquat applied sequentially at 0.19 ppmv ai for two consecutive months over 2 yr (2016 and 2017). Biweekly removal gave the most consistent control of B. umbellatus biomass and propagules. Diquat application along with monthly and bimonthly clippings gave varying degrees of B. umbellatus control. Clipping once per growing season did not control B. umbellatus when compared with reference plants, while clipping B. umbellatus every 2 wk (biweekly) controlled rush propagules most effectively. However, it is unlikely this method will be sufficient as a stand-alone control option due to the slow speed of harvester boats, the potential these boats have to spread B. umbellatus propagules to more sites, and the expense of mechanical operations. However, clipping could be used as part of an integrated strategy for B. umbellatus control. Article in Journal/Newspaper Butomus umbellatus Cambridge University Press Invasive Plant Science and Management 12 02 120 123
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Flowering rush ( Butomus umbellatus L.) is an invasive aquatic and wetland plant capable of developing monotypic stands in emergent and submersed sites. This plant can rapidly outcompete native vegetation and impede human practices by reducing recreation (boating, fishing, and skiing) and disrupting agricultural use of water resources (irrigation canals). Mechanical removal practices occurring biweekly, monthly, bimonthly, and once per growing season were compared with chemical control with diquat applied sequentially at 0.19 ppmv ai for two consecutive months over 2 yr (2016 and 2017). Biweekly removal gave the most consistent control of B. umbellatus biomass and propagules. Diquat application along with monthly and bimonthly clippings gave varying degrees of B. umbellatus control. Clipping once per growing season did not control B. umbellatus when compared with reference plants, while clipping B. umbellatus every 2 wk (biweekly) controlled rush propagules most effectively. However, it is unlikely this method will be sufficient as a stand-alone control option due to the slow speed of harvester boats, the potential these boats have to spread B. umbellatus propagules to more sites, and the expense of mechanical operations. However, clipping could be used as part of an integrated strategy for B. umbellatus control.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Turnage, Gray
Madsen, John D.
Wersal, Ryan M.
Byrd, John D.
spellingShingle Turnage, Gray
Madsen, John D.
Wersal, Ryan M.
Byrd, John D.
Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
author_facet Turnage, Gray
Madsen, John D.
Wersal, Ryan M.
Byrd, John D.
author_sort Turnage, Gray
title Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_short Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_full Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_fullStr Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_full_unstemmed Simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
title_sort simulated mechanical control of flowering rush (butomus umbellatus) under mesocosm conditions
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2019
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1939729119000063
genre Butomus umbellatus
genre_facet Butomus umbellatus
op_source Invasive Plant Science and Management
volume 12, issue 02, page 120-123
ISSN 1939-7291 1939-747X
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2019.6
container_title Invasive Plant Science and Management
container_volume 12
container_issue 02
container_start_page 120
op_container_end_page 123
_version_ 1810437720672043008