Statnett SF v. Sør-Fosen Sijte (Sup. Ct. Nor.)

On October 11, 2021, the Supreme Court of Norway, sitting as a Grand Chamber, had to decide in three interconnected cases (HR-2021-1975-S) whether the construction of certain wind power plants, which will form part of the largest onshore wind power project in Europe, in a particular rural area inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Legal Materials
Main Author: Syring, Tom
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2022.42
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020782922000420
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/ilm.2022.42
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/ilm.2022.42 2024-03-03T08:48:28+00:00 Statnett SF v. Sør-Fosen Sijte (Sup. Ct. Nor.) Syring, Tom 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2022.42 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020782922000420 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms International Legal Materials volume 61, issue 6, page 991-1017 ISSN 0020-7829 1930-6571 General Medicine journal-article 2022 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2022.42 2024-02-08T08:39:08Z On October 11, 2021, the Supreme Court of Norway, sitting as a Grand Chamber, had to decide in three interconnected cases (HR-2021-1975-S) whether the construction of certain wind power plants, which will form part of the largest onshore wind power project in Europe, in a particular rural area interfered with (Sami) reindeer herders’ rights to enjoy their own culture according to Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The case, which had been initiated long before Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and concomitant spiking energy prices—which might have added an extra dimension to the underlying, countervailing issues—pits efforts to increasingly produce “green,” renewable energy and the minority rights of a particular cultural group against each other. Taking the peculiar requirements of reindeer husbandry, the need for safe winter pastures, and the specific geographical conditions of the locus delicti into account, the Court concluded that the windfarms would have a substantial negative effect on the reindeer herders’ possibility to enjoy their own culture, which, in the absence of satisfactory remedy measures, threatened the very existence of reindeer husbandry on Fosen, and therefore found a violation of Article 27, ICCPR. Article in Journal/Newspaper reindeer husbandry sami sami Cambridge University Press Norway International Legal Materials 1 27
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Medicine
spellingShingle General Medicine
Syring, Tom
Statnett SF v. Sør-Fosen Sijte (Sup. Ct. Nor.)
topic_facet General Medicine
description On October 11, 2021, the Supreme Court of Norway, sitting as a Grand Chamber, had to decide in three interconnected cases (HR-2021-1975-S) whether the construction of certain wind power plants, which will form part of the largest onshore wind power project in Europe, in a particular rural area interfered with (Sami) reindeer herders’ rights to enjoy their own culture according to Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The case, which had been initiated long before Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and concomitant spiking energy prices—which might have added an extra dimension to the underlying, countervailing issues—pits efforts to increasingly produce “green,” renewable energy and the minority rights of a particular cultural group against each other. Taking the peculiar requirements of reindeer husbandry, the need for safe winter pastures, and the specific geographical conditions of the locus delicti into account, the Court concluded that the windfarms would have a substantial negative effect on the reindeer herders’ possibility to enjoy their own culture, which, in the absence of satisfactory remedy measures, threatened the very existence of reindeer husbandry on Fosen, and therefore found a violation of Article 27, ICCPR.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Syring, Tom
author_facet Syring, Tom
author_sort Syring, Tom
title Statnett SF v. Sør-Fosen Sijte (Sup. Ct. Nor.)
title_short Statnett SF v. Sør-Fosen Sijte (Sup. Ct. Nor.)
title_full Statnett SF v. Sør-Fosen Sijte (Sup. Ct. Nor.)
title_fullStr Statnett SF v. Sør-Fosen Sijte (Sup. Ct. Nor.)
title_full_unstemmed Statnett SF v. Sør-Fosen Sijte (Sup. Ct. Nor.)
title_sort statnett sf v. sør-fosen sijte (sup. ct. nor.)
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2022.42
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0020782922000420
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre reindeer husbandry
sami
sami
genre_facet reindeer husbandry
sami
sami
op_source International Legal Materials
volume 61, issue 6, page 991-1017
ISSN 0020-7829 1930-6571
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2022.42
container_title International Legal Materials
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 27
_version_ 1792505343346999296