Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut

Abstract This paper examines the nature of person complementarity in Eastern Canadian Inuktitut (Eskimo-Aleut), arguing that despite its apparent patterning as a Person Case Constraint (PCC) effect, it is not due to the presence of a defective intervener blocking person agreement with a lower argume...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique
Main Author: Compton, Richard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2019.20
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0008413119000203
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/cnj.2019.20
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/cnj.2019.20 2024-03-03T08:36:25+00:00 Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut Compton, Richard 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2019.20 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0008413119000203 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique volume 64, issue 4, page 592-616 ISSN 0008-4131 1710-1115 Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics journal-article 2019 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2019.20 2024-02-08T08:26:37Z Abstract This paper examines the nature of person complementarity in Eastern Canadian Inuktitut (Eskimo-Aleut), arguing that despite its apparent patterning as a Person Case Constraint (PCC) effect, it is not due to the presence of a defective intervener blocking person agreement with a lower argument, as is often the case in other languages. Instead, the observed effect is caused by a defective or missing person probe on C that cannot value local person features on absolutive arguments. Given the use of the PCC as a diagnostic for differentiating clitics and agreement, this result has implications for the proper identification of φ -marking in Inuktitut. Article in Journal/Newspaper aleut eskimo* Eskimo–Aleut inuktitut Cambridge University Press Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 64 4 592 616
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
spellingShingle Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
Compton, Richard
Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut
topic_facet Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
description Abstract This paper examines the nature of person complementarity in Eastern Canadian Inuktitut (Eskimo-Aleut), arguing that despite its apparent patterning as a Person Case Constraint (PCC) effect, it is not due to the presence of a defective intervener blocking person agreement with a lower argument, as is often the case in other languages. Instead, the observed effect is caused by a defective or missing person probe on C that cannot value local person features on absolutive arguments. Given the use of the PCC as a diagnostic for differentiating clitics and agreement, this result has implications for the proper identification of φ -marking in Inuktitut.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Compton, Richard
author_facet Compton, Richard
author_sort Compton, Richard
title Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut
title_short Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut
title_full Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut
title_fullStr Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut
title_full_unstemmed Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut
title_sort person complementarity and (pseudo) person case constraint effects: evidence from inuktitut
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2019
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2019.20
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0008413119000203
genre aleut
eskimo*
Eskimo–Aleut
inuktitut
genre_facet aleut
eskimo*
Eskimo–Aleut
inuktitut
op_source Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique
volume 64, issue 4, page 592-616
ISSN 0008-4131 1710-1115
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2019.20
container_title Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique
container_volume 64
container_issue 4
container_start_page 592
op_container_end_page 616
_version_ 1792506745391677440