The Queen v . Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Greenpeace Limited
617 Relationship of international law and municipal law — European Community legislation — European Community Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (“Habitats Directive”) — Geographical scope of Habitats Directive — Whether Habitats Directive...
Published in: | International Law Reports |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
2002
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152492.011 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S030906710001203X |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/cbo9781316152492.011 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/cbo9781316152492.011 2024-03-03T08:46:22+00:00 The Queen v . Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Greenpeace Limited 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152492.011 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S030906710001203X en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms International Law Reports volume 120, page 617-656 ISSN 0309-0671 2633-707X journal-article 2002 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152492.011 2024-02-08T08:45:49Z 617 Relationship of international law and municipal law — European Community legislation — European Community Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (“Habitats Directive”) — Geographical scope of Habitats Directive — Whether Habitats Directive applying to United Kingdom continental shelf and superjacent waters — United Kingdom transposing requirements of Habitats Directive into municipal law — Conservation (Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora) Regulations 1994 (“1994 Regulations”) — Application of 1994 Regulations limited to territorial sea — Whether 1994 Regulations complete and lawful implementation of Habitats Directive — Secretary of State for Trade and Industry failing to consider Habitats Directive in licensing process with respect to area beyond territorial sea — Whether legally erroneous — Whether public interest in compliance with Habitats Directive Environment — Environmental protection — Habitats Directive aiming to protect lophelia pertusa and cetaceans — Whether oil exploration and production in Atlantic Frontier beyond territorial sea harmful to lophelia pertusa and cetaceans — Whether relevant provisions of Habitats Directive providing Greenpeace with grounds of challenge Sea — Continental shelf — Exclusive fishery zone — Environmental protection — Whether EC environmental legislation extending to areas outside territorial waters — The law of England Article in Journal/Newspaper Lophelia pertusa Cambridge University Press International Law Reports 120 617 656 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
description |
617 Relationship of international law and municipal law — European Community legislation — European Community Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (“Habitats Directive”) — Geographical scope of Habitats Directive — Whether Habitats Directive applying to United Kingdom continental shelf and superjacent waters — United Kingdom transposing requirements of Habitats Directive into municipal law — Conservation (Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora) Regulations 1994 (“1994 Regulations”) — Application of 1994 Regulations limited to territorial sea — Whether 1994 Regulations complete and lawful implementation of Habitats Directive — Secretary of State for Trade and Industry failing to consider Habitats Directive in licensing process with respect to area beyond territorial sea — Whether legally erroneous — Whether public interest in compliance with Habitats Directive Environment — Environmental protection — Habitats Directive aiming to protect lophelia pertusa and cetaceans — Whether oil exploration and production in Atlantic Frontier beyond territorial sea harmful to lophelia pertusa and cetaceans — Whether relevant provisions of Habitats Directive providing Greenpeace with grounds of challenge Sea — Continental shelf — Exclusive fishery zone — Environmental protection — Whether EC environmental legislation extending to areas outside territorial waters — The law of England |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
title |
The Queen v . Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Greenpeace Limited |
spellingShingle |
The Queen v . Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Greenpeace Limited |
title_short |
The Queen v . Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Greenpeace Limited |
title_full |
The Queen v . Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Greenpeace Limited |
title_fullStr |
The Queen v . Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Greenpeace Limited |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Queen v . Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Greenpeace Limited |
title_sort |
queen v . secretary of state for trade and industry, ex parte greenpeace limited |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152492.011 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S030906710001203X |
genre |
Lophelia pertusa |
genre_facet |
Lophelia pertusa |
op_source |
International Law Reports volume 120, page 617-656 ISSN 0309-0671 2633-707X |
op_rights |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152492.011 |
container_title |
International Law Reports |
container_volume |
120 |
container_start_page |
617 |
op_container_end_page |
656 |
_version_ |
1792502387454246912 |