Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another

Jurisdiction — Territorial — Extraterritorial effect of legislation — United States Congress — Presumption against extraterritorial effect — Whether presumption to be strictly applied — Legislation regulating conduct to be performed within United States — Conduct causing effect outside United States...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Law Reports
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0309067100018840
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 2024-03-03T08:38:56+00:00 Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another 1995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0309067100018840 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms International Law Reports volume 100, page 519-530 ISSN 0309-0671 2633-707X journal-article 1995 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 2024-02-08T08:35:56Z Jurisdiction — Territorial — Extraterritorial effect of legislation — United States Congress — Presumption against extraterritorial effect — Whether presumption to be strictly applied — Legislation regulating conduct to be performed within United States — Conduct causing effect outside United States — Environmental legislation requiring federal agencies to prepare environmental impact statement prior to sanctioning actions affecting the environment — Whether requiring federal agency to prepare impact statement prior to incinerating food waste in Antarctica — Whether presumption to be applied to legislation where United States exercising legislative but not sovereign control over territory — Allegation that requirement to prepare impact statement interfering with United States participation in international co-operation programme to improve environment in Antarctica Environment — Antarctica — Incineration of food waste — Effect on environment — Federal agency of United States failing to prepare environmental impact statement prior to authorizing incineration in Antarctica — Whether United States environmental legislation requiring preparation of impact statement applicable to Antarctica — National Environmental Policy Act — Whether provisions conflicting with Protocol to the Antarctic Treaty 520 Territory — Antarctica — Sovereignty — Designation as “global common” — Whether United States having legislative control over Antarctica — Antarctic Treaty, 1959 — The law of the United States Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic International Law Reports 100 519 530
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Jurisdiction — Territorial — Extraterritorial effect of legislation — United States Congress — Presumption against extraterritorial effect — Whether presumption to be strictly applied — Legislation regulating conduct to be performed within United States — Conduct causing effect outside United States — Environmental legislation requiring federal agencies to prepare environmental impact statement prior to sanctioning actions affecting the environment — Whether requiring federal agency to prepare impact statement prior to incinerating food waste in Antarctica — Whether presumption to be applied to legislation where United States exercising legislative but not sovereign control over territory — Allegation that requirement to prepare impact statement interfering with United States participation in international co-operation programme to improve environment in Antarctica Environment — Antarctica — Incineration of food waste — Effect on environment — Federal agency of United States failing to prepare environmental impact statement prior to authorizing incineration in Antarctica — Whether United States environmental legislation requiring preparation of impact statement applicable to Antarctica — National Environmental Policy Act — Whether provisions conflicting with Protocol to the Antarctic Treaty 520 Territory — Antarctica — Sovereignty — Designation as “global common” — Whether United States having legislative control over Antarctica — Antarctic Treaty, 1959 — The law of the United States
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another
spellingShingle Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another
title_short Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another
title_full Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another
title_fullStr Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another
title_sort environmental defense fund inc v . massey and another
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1995
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0309067100018840
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
op_source International Law Reports
volume 100, page 519-530
ISSN 0309-0671 2633-707X
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025
container_title International Law Reports
container_volume 100
container_start_page 519
op_container_end_page 530
_version_ 1792494323439239168