Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another
Jurisdiction — Territorial — Extraterritorial effect of legislation — United States Congress — Presumption against extraterritorial effect — Whether presumption to be strictly applied — Legislation regulating conduct to be performed within United States — Conduct causing effect outside United States...
Published in: | International Law Reports |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
1995
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0309067100018840 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 2024-03-03T08:38:56+00:00 Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another 1995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0309067100018840 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms International Law Reports volume 100, page 519-530 ISSN 0309-0671 2633-707X journal-article 1995 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 2024-02-08T08:35:56Z Jurisdiction — Territorial — Extraterritorial effect of legislation — United States Congress — Presumption against extraterritorial effect — Whether presumption to be strictly applied — Legislation regulating conduct to be performed within United States — Conduct causing effect outside United States — Environmental legislation requiring federal agencies to prepare environmental impact statement prior to sanctioning actions affecting the environment — Whether requiring federal agency to prepare impact statement prior to incinerating food waste in Antarctica — Whether presumption to be applied to legislation where United States exercising legislative but not sovereign control over territory — Allegation that requirement to prepare impact statement interfering with United States participation in international co-operation programme to improve environment in Antarctica Environment — Antarctica — Incineration of food waste — Effect on environment — Federal agency of United States failing to prepare environmental impact statement prior to authorizing incineration in Antarctica — Whether United States environmental legislation requiring preparation of impact statement applicable to Antarctica — National Environmental Policy Act — Whether provisions conflicting with Protocol to the Antarctic Treaty 520 Territory — Antarctica — Sovereignty — Designation as “global common” — Whether United States having legislative control over Antarctica — Antarctic Treaty, 1959 — The law of the United States Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic International Law Reports 100 519 530 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
description |
Jurisdiction — Territorial — Extraterritorial effect of legislation — United States Congress — Presumption against extraterritorial effect — Whether presumption to be strictly applied — Legislation regulating conduct to be performed within United States — Conduct causing effect outside United States — Environmental legislation requiring federal agencies to prepare environmental impact statement prior to sanctioning actions affecting the environment — Whether requiring federal agency to prepare impact statement prior to incinerating food waste in Antarctica — Whether presumption to be applied to legislation where United States exercising legislative but not sovereign control over territory — Allegation that requirement to prepare impact statement interfering with United States participation in international co-operation programme to improve environment in Antarctica Environment — Antarctica — Incineration of food waste — Effect on environment — Federal agency of United States failing to prepare environmental impact statement prior to authorizing incineration in Antarctica — Whether United States environmental legislation requiring preparation of impact statement applicable to Antarctica — National Environmental Policy Act — Whether provisions conflicting with Protocol to the Antarctic Treaty 520 Territory — Antarctica — Sovereignty — Designation as “global common” — Whether United States having legislative control over Antarctica — Antarctic Treaty, 1959 — The law of the United States |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
title |
Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another |
spellingShingle |
Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another |
title_short |
Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another |
title_full |
Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another |
title_fullStr |
Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another |
title_full_unstemmed |
Environmental Defense Fund Inc v . Massey and Another |
title_sort |
environmental defense fund inc v . massey and another |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
1995 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0309067100018840 |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica |
op_source |
International Law Reports volume 100, page 519-530 ISSN 0309-0671 2633-707X |
op_rights |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316152294.025 |
container_title |
International Law Reports |
container_volume |
100 |
container_start_page |
519 |
op_container_end_page |
530 |
_version_ |
1792494323439239168 |