Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse ( Mus musculus), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus) and black rat ( Rattus rattus)

Abstract Population control of the house mouse ( Mus musculus ), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus ) and black rat ( Rattus rattus ) is common practice worldwide. Our objective was to assess the impact on animal welfare of lethal and non-lethal control methods, including three dispatch methods. We used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal Welfare
Main Authors: De Ruyver, Ciska, Baert, Kristof, Cartuyvels, Emma, Beernaert, Lies AL, Tuyttens, Frank AM, Leirs, Herwig, Moons, Christel PH
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/awf.2022.2
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728622000021
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/awf.2022.2
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/awf.2022.2 2024-06-09T07:49:14+00:00 Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse ( Mus musculus), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus) and black rat ( Rattus rattus) De Ruyver, Ciska Baert, Kristof Cartuyvels, Emma Beernaert, Lies AL Tuyttens, Frank AM Leirs, Herwig Moons, Christel PH 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/awf.2022.2 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728622000021 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Animal Welfare volume 32 ISSN 0962-7286 2054-1538 journal-article 2023 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2022.2 2024-05-15T13:11:01Z Abstract Population control of the house mouse ( Mus musculus ), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus ) and black rat ( Rattus rattus ) is common practice worldwide. Our objective was to assess the impact on animal welfare of lethal and non-lethal control methods, including three dispatch methods. We used the Sharp and Saunders welfare assessment model with eight experts scoring eleven control methods and three dispatch methods used on the three species. We presumed the methods were performed as prescribed, only taking into account the effect on the target animal (and not, for example, on non-target catches). We did not assess population control efficacy of the methods. Methods considered to induce the least suffering to the target animal were captive-bolt traps, electrocution traps and cervical dislocation, while those with the greatest impact were anticoagulants, cholecalciferol and deprivation. Experts indicated considerable uncertainty regarding their evaluation of certain methods, which emphasises the need for further scientific research. In particular, the impact of hydrogen cyanide, chloralose and aluminium phosphide on animal welfare ought to be investigated. The experts also stressed the need to improve Standard Operating Procedures and to incorporate animal welfare assessments in Integrated Pest Management (IPM). The results of our study can help laypeople, professionals, regulatory agencies and legislators making well-informed decisions as to which methods to use when controlling commensal rodents. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rattus rattus Cambridge University Press Norway Saunders ENVELOPE(-45.316,-45.316,-60.700,-60.700) Animal Welfare 32
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Population control of the house mouse ( Mus musculus ), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus ) and black rat ( Rattus rattus ) is common practice worldwide. Our objective was to assess the impact on animal welfare of lethal and non-lethal control methods, including three dispatch methods. We used the Sharp and Saunders welfare assessment model with eight experts scoring eleven control methods and three dispatch methods used on the three species. We presumed the methods were performed as prescribed, only taking into account the effect on the target animal (and not, for example, on non-target catches). We did not assess population control efficacy of the methods. Methods considered to induce the least suffering to the target animal were captive-bolt traps, electrocution traps and cervical dislocation, while those with the greatest impact were anticoagulants, cholecalciferol and deprivation. Experts indicated considerable uncertainty regarding their evaluation of certain methods, which emphasises the need for further scientific research. In particular, the impact of hydrogen cyanide, chloralose and aluminium phosphide on animal welfare ought to be investigated. The experts also stressed the need to improve Standard Operating Procedures and to incorporate animal welfare assessments in Integrated Pest Management (IPM). The results of our study can help laypeople, professionals, regulatory agencies and legislators making well-informed decisions as to which methods to use when controlling commensal rodents.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author De Ruyver, Ciska
Baert, Kristof
Cartuyvels, Emma
Beernaert, Lies AL
Tuyttens, Frank AM
Leirs, Herwig
Moons, Christel PH
spellingShingle De Ruyver, Ciska
Baert, Kristof
Cartuyvels, Emma
Beernaert, Lies AL
Tuyttens, Frank AM
Leirs, Herwig
Moons, Christel PH
Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse ( Mus musculus), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus) and black rat ( Rattus rattus)
author_facet De Ruyver, Ciska
Baert, Kristof
Cartuyvels, Emma
Beernaert, Lies AL
Tuyttens, Frank AM
Leirs, Herwig
Moons, Christel PH
author_sort De Ruyver, Ciska
title Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse ( Mus musculus), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus) and black rat ( Rattus rattus)
title_short Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse ( Mus musculus), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus) and black rat ( Rattus rattus)
title_full Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse ( Mus musculus), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus) and black rat ( Rattus rattus)
title_fullStr Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse ( Mus musculus), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus) and black rat ( Rattus rattus)
title_full_unstemmed Assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse ( Mus musculus), Norway rat ( Rattus norvegicus) and black rat ( Rattus rattus)
title_sort assessing animal welfare impact of fourteen control and dispatch methods for house mouse ( mus musculus), norway rat ( rattus norvegicus) and black rat ( rattus rattus)
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/awf.2022.2
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728622000021
long_lat ENVELOPE(-45.316,-45.316,-60.700,-60.700)
geographic Norway
Saunders
geographic_facet Norway
Saunders
genre Rattus rattus
genre_facet Rattus rattus
op_source Animal Welfare
volume 32
ISSN 0962-7286 2054-1538
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2022.2
container_title Animal Welfare
container_volume 32
_version_ 1801381585173348352